Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Half\s+inch\s+Andrews\s+Heliax\s+LDF4\-50A\s+vs\s+LMR\-400\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:37:49 -0500
As I consider the materials required to replace my 30 year old tower, rotor, antenna and cables, I have several like new runs on LDF4-50A terminated with N-male which could run from my ground window
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00293.html (8,734 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:53:53 -0500
Gary Andrew makes UHF female connectors for 1/2 LDF. If you use male male jumpers at the top and bottom you can avoid the adapter issues. The old part number is L44U...there may be a new number in re
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00294.html (9,434 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:16:34 -0400
Greetings, From my experience, the use of Hardline on HF does not affect loss very much. I've seen more problems with poor connector attachment or lightning pinholes that allow water to seep in. No m
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00297.html (10,295 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:28:47 -0700
On 4/24/2013 9:37 AM, GARY HUBER wrote: As I consider the materials required to replace my 30 year old tower, rotor, antenna and cables, I have several like new runs on LDF4-50A terminated with N-mal
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00298.html (9,260 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:13:36 -0500 (CDT)
I'd use the LDF4-50 with the N type connectors. From there around the rotor I use good quality RG-8 or RG-213 with a N connector on one end and a UHF on the other. At the window I'd change that to a
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00316.html (10,985 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:36:15 -0600
after all I have read on coaxial cable, I would choose the LMR-400. the difference in signal loss at such a short run would not be noticeable to the ear. jack ak7o --Original Message-- From: GARY HUB
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00319.html (10,656 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:46:09 +0000
Absoutely Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00320.html (8,227 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:27:38 -0500
It looks like maybe the LMR-400 has two tenths of a deciBel more loss below 30 MHz, IF everything is perfect with the Heliax connectors and the rotor jumper. The 75 feet of LMR-400 is a lot easier to
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00321.html (9,340 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:50:40 -0500
But is one going to operate at 30 MHz frequently? Doubtful. Of course loss decreases with frequency. Anytime I have a feedline total loss less than 1 dB measured {key point is measured not "book" num
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00322.html (10,875 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:21:19 -0500
The assumption here was that he already owned the Heliax. If I were to buy new coax for my tower it would be just what I bought last time..Times Microwave LMR-600. I have 6 150' runs out and up the 6
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00323.html (11,963 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: Ron <n5qv@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
I'd worry more about connector assemblies and water tightness.   Ron - N5QV But is one going to operate at 30 MHz frequently?  Doubtful.  Of course loss decreases with frequency.  Anytime I have a fe
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00324.html (11,680 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] OT: Half inch Andrews Heliax LDF4-50A vs LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: Craig Thompson <craig@thompsonet.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:52:34 -0500
Hi Gary I would use the 1/2" Heliax. I use both and the outer jacket of the Heliax is superior to the LMR for both water and sun. It also has lower loss. I would use LMR400 UF or similar for the rota
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00325.html (11,766 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu