Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Indoor\s+antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Indoor\s+antenna\s*$/: 65 ]

Total 65 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:09:13 -0800 (PST); This month's QST has a real good article on a flagpole antenna. Another article a few years back shows how to put a Hustler 5BTV inside PVC water pipe. Might want to look at those. Good luck with th; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00487.html (12,058 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: Bill Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:08:47 +0000; Jim, It is that philosophy that puts ALL HAMS IN A BAD POSITION WITH NON-HAMS. I have worked DXCC with indoor antennas runing QRP power levels. Most associations will come down hard on your outside a; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00490.html (10,661 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:24:27 -0500; Years ago, when I worked at an FM radio station (and this was long before PRB-1, incidentally), a local amateur had a problem getting his tower zoned. (Actually, he had been issued a permit, and then; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00491.html (11,691 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:50:48 -0800; A couple of things come to mind, Rick. Probably more often than not, the XYL has a lot to say about which house to buy that may or may not take the OM's hobby into consideration. Having a wife who is; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00494.html (9,710 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:02:10 -0600; I don't agree with that at all Jim. I think there is indeed a justification for stealth antennas. If nobody detects it, it doesn't bother anyone and everyone is happy. No damage done at all. If you m; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00496.html (12,380 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:16:08 -0500; Local hams in my area tend to prefer the remote antenna tuner/random wire solution. Many are using the Icom remote antenna tuner, and as long and high a wire, as far away from the house, as possible.; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00503.html (10,249 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:19:07 -0500; I cannot believe how many wives do NOT consider their husband's hobby interests important. My wife likes me... likes my dog... likes my hobby. I give her the same respect and support. It is working r; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00515.html (11,077 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 03:12:31 -0600; I have to agree with attachments to the roof or the house. They don't add to pleasant life. Sure are nice for short feed lines, but unless you are in a place the wind never blows they can be annoying; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00517.html (13,126 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:17:55 +0000 (UTC); Hold on there. Then you'd have to share your toys and some of the time at the key. I'm very fortunate like that, too. We bought this home (1.6 acres) just so I could have a 100 ft tower (in the spri; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00518.html (10,009 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: kf6e@mail.com; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:39:49 -0500; QSL. Frank KF6E I think it is a real shame that things have reached the point where we hams have to put up these sneak antennas, as if we are doing something illegal, or operating spy stations in ene; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00523.html (9,750 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: kf6e@mail.com; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:57:16 -0500; --Original Message-- I agree. In my case, I had been inactive for many years, so I didn't even consider an antenna when purchasing the house. Then my old Sony ICF-2001 died after 40 years of faithful; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00524.html (11,559 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: kf6e@mail.com; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:04:07 -0500; Thanks. If flagpoles were allowed, I'd have a flagpole antenna. I spent about a half hour talking with my lawyer last night, and there are no loopholes in VA law that I could use. The only flags allo; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00525.html (13,515 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: kf6e@mail.com; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:06:48 -0500; There are several commercial flagpole antennas available, and S9 antennas come very close to your description. All that being said... I wonder why no one has marketed a flag pole antenna, using a hol; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00526.html (11,497 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:27:50 -0600 (CST); I have an S9 antenna; picked it up last year and then plans changed. It's a very nice antenna, but it is not structurally robust enough to masquerade as a flag pole. That aside, I think you missed my; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00528.html (12,770 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:56:39 -0600; Go for it , Ron. Sounds like a great idea! I think MJF has some cheap stuff you could use for a base to start with. If you build it, they will come! Actually I believe I have seen a commercial antenn; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00529.html (13,379 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor antenna (score: 1): Author: Ray Sills <raysills@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:28:51 -0500; Force 12 makes a flagpole antenna. Their design is all metal, not PVC with a wire inside (although that should certainly work, too). Like any ground mounted vertical, it needs radials (as many as you; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00530.html (9,355 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley <clayton_n4ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:43:45 -0800 (PST); I remember several years ago Al Henderson (SK) K6AJ and I made two 3-500z amps and Al took one of his verticals to VA. They were installed and as far as I know, it's still there and working. Al was; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00534.html (14,906 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:45:56 -0500; I know of a ham who put up a wood utility pole - heavy duty - and mounted a big honking halogen light on it. He ran the wire from the house to the pole over ground... from the peak of the house to th; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00537.html (19,403 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: Paul Gentry <phgentry@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:39:38 -0500; Remember an outdoor television antenna is protected by FCC regulations that supersede any CC&Rs. An HF antenna can be easily hidden within the confines of the mast, grounding, cabling, guying, etc. C; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00543.html (22,396 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] OT: Indoor Antenna (score: 1): Author: "Pumbaa" <pinkertontommrs@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:02:15 -0600; ?I talked with a ham in Florida that was using coax on the ground and running it to a mobile antenna on his car. Is this a violation of a CC&R restriction? Illegal to park in your own drive way? Wher; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-11/msg00551.html (10,672 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]