Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Openwire\/Window\s+Line\s+and\s+Bad\s+Wx\s*$/: 86 ]

Total 86 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:54:22 +0200
I extracted this topic from the other thread on the Model 238. How does bad weather affect openwire compared to its effect on window line? Lots of opinions, lots of myths. Bob Allison (WB1CGM) and Jo
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00433.html (11,554 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Scott Harwood <scotthsr@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 06:44:48 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
That was a great article. I'm a huge fan of open wire also. Scott K4VWK --Original Message-- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00437.html (9,538 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:20:02 -0400
I also use openwire feeder with 4" spacing. Rain, snow, ice, wind, hot, cool, the tuner usually doesn't have to be adjusted. (Unless it's unusually hot or cold) 73 de Phil - N8PS PS. I agree with Sco
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00438.html (10,221 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:20:09 -0500
One end of my 160M antenna being #12 hard drawn copper, about 30 ft from the feed point runs through the top of a Maple tree. The only thing I've noticed is the leaves and limbs burnt at the point th
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00439.html (12,573 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:27:24 -0500
Hello Rick, I did go to the archives and read the W1ZR article. It was pretty basic stuff. There is another source of info about Open Feeders. Just go to Google and search ... The Lure of Ladder Line
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00440.html (13,565 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Scott Harwood <scotthsr@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:43:52 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
If you don't want to go to all the trouble, check out W&EP's 600 ohm open wire line.(http://www.trueladderline.com/). It's inexpensive and good quality. I've used it for years. Scott K4VWK --Original
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00442.html (10,911 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:56:15 -0700
I'm surprised you're burning the tree at only 30' from the feed point. I wouldn't be surprised at a quarter wavelength out but 30' on 160 meters is maybe .05 wavelength out or something. Should be hi
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00443.html (14,247 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:17:59 -0500
As my Old Elmer always said " Life is Too Short for QRP " When you care enough to send a readable signal ! It should be QRO............ QRP has it's place in the Outback and Power Limited situations.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00444.html (16,901 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Jim Vohland <n9vo@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:34:10 -0400
You raise some good points about power levels, but ya know, sometimes its just fun to try and work with a qrp rig. Lots of times, I get 5/9 reports until they find out I'm only running 5 watts. Oh, w
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00445.html (18,762 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:50:56 -0500
Good Point there Jon, I normally run the 40 watts of drive used with the setup of the SB-200. Then there are those ThunderBoomer nights on 40 and 80 meters where it is nice to be heard. 40 to 400 Wat
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00446.html (20,964 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:52:39 +0200
Wade, That article is basically the same story that Lew McCoy (W1ICP) told me in 1963. I switched immediately from coax to openwire for my low band antennas and used it at nearly every QTH for the ne
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00447.html (15,691 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:22:21 +0100
ARRL literature has consistently underestimated the losses of ladderline. For example, the matched losses quoted in the ARRL Antenna Book - at least up to the 21st edition - are about one half the fi
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00449.html (12,011 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: denton sprague <denton@oregontrail.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:05:34 -0700
Interesting In my case I have a horizontal 80 meter loop up 30 ft, fed with about 42 ft of 450 ohm ladder line currently with a 4 to 1 balun just outside the shack window. Swr is flat except on 80 an
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00450.html (12,963 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:05:34 +0200
It sounds as if you found their problem. Maybe they did forget to multiply by 2. I think more important than the absolute loss in openwire is how it fairs to coax. After all we don't really have any
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00451.html (13,213 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 18:41:05 -0500
Someone needs a new copy of the FCC rules which reminds hams that the minimum power necessary is to be used for transmitting. -Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00454.html (8,294 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 19:48:31 -0500
Very true. I have mostly worked QRP over the years, and while it can be frustrating at times, getting a new one with 5 to 10 watts is quite a thrill. The last sunspot peak, I was writing my doctoral
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00457.html (9,936 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:53:44 -0400
Well, if you consummate the transaction, I hope he buys the beer! -- K8JHR -- I HAVE NO COMMERCIAL INTEREST IN THE COMPANY IN THAT LINK, in fact it is the biggest competitor to my own company, but it
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00459.html (11,320 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:25:34 -0400
As a new ham, I sometimes tried checking into a net using only 5 watts. I would get wise after Net Control said I had a weak signal. After adjusting it, they would say something metaphysical about "t
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00460.html (9,463 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:31:36 -0400
I have long been intrigued by the photo of the humongous dual knife switch displayed on that site... it would be effective at isolating the wire from the rig, but how would one protect it from lightn
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00461.html (7,955 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 04:20:46 +0000
Not exactly. You're leaving out the part about it being for the desired communications. That leaves it open for much interpretation. 73, Dave K8MN -Stuart K5KVH ______________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00462.html (9,256 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu