Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Question\s+for\s+Contesters\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:30:16 -0400
Reading the exchanges between Sinisa and Ulrich got me to wondering: My impression of the recent CQ WPX CW contest was that there were a LOT fewer contesters on the air than I had expected. But I am
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00210.html (7,847 bytes)

2. [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:54:28 -0400
W3ULS: fewer contesters on the air than I had expected. 1. 10 meters is dead (versus ~1600 Q's in 2001 when I set the current USA record). 2. 80 and 160 are always extremely noisy at this time of yea
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00212.html (7,647 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:07:50 -0500
I participated for two primary reasons: 1) To keep my operating skills sharp in preparation for Field Day 2) To get another data point on propagation for Field Day. Jim K9YC _________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00213.html (7,921 bytes)

4. [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 16:09:27 -0400
I forgot: 4. Memorial Day weekend which is a 3-day holiday for many in the USA. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00214.html (7,097 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:38:56 -0500
Naturally, propagation conditions and other factors impact the number of contest entries, sometimes more so on the high bands than low. Did you observe across all the bands or only the higher bands t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00218.html (7,714 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:00:13 -0500
Jim, What is your take on this years conditions as compared with last year, re Field Day? 10 and 15 seem iffy here. Thanks and 73, Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00220.html (8,023 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:22:55 -0500
During WPX, the only stuff I worked on 10 was a handful of guys in the Carribean. 15 was good for less than 100 Q's. My guess is that with luck, 10 might be good for a couple of hours and 15 might be
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00222.html (8,754 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:42:14 -0500
I'm no expert in this, yet it seems like the last few months, I've been hearing activity on 20M through the night. Not a lot of activity but some good DX, Got through to south africa on 20M at midnii
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00224.html (9,786 bytes)

9. RE: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:07:09 -0700
We just had our Region-1 Field Day here in Europe last weekend. 10m was WAY DOWN over last year. I think we managed perhaps 50 Q's, not more - even though we increased our overall score slightly over
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00225.html (9,729 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:24:45 -0500
Thanks Rick for the report on Europe's 10m Field Day. That was about what I feared. Definitely time to steel ops to static or get static elimination working well on 80m and 160m! 73, Stuart K5KVH ___
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00226.html (8,437 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:37:50 -0500
The intermittent DX on 20m around Central time midnite is experienced here. Probably decaying clouds of ionization. We see a progression of 20m contacts in the evening from the Western USA to HI, the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00227.html (8,828 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 19:54:24 -0400
Actual on the air observation has shown over the past month that 20 mtrs is a better band than either 40 or 80m. Significantly less QRN and much more activity. 20m is frequently open until about 4am,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00228.html (9,450 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:58:51 -0500
Tom, Thanks for your band observations. All very helpful in planning FD strategy. Of course, there is the Stuart Rohre theorem: On FD, all that emitted RF goes up to ionosphere and increases the refl
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00229.html (8,860 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 20:00:43 -0400
Doesn't require an expert!! Just listening works. Concur that 20m has been quite good late into the mornings. Very good signals from UA0 and UA9 land. Not very many JA sigs, but around 4am Hawaii sig
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00230.html (11,520 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question for Contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 19:02:00 -0500
Jim's Plan seems a very good one for Field Day. Groups should seek all the bonus points to help out this year! We had trouble and cannot field a "true" GOTA station team. Seems unfair to expect green
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00231.html (9,156 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu