Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Question\s+on\s+Coax\s+Cable\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Question\s+on\s+Coax\s+Cable\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OT: Question on Coax Cable (score: 1): Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:05:55 +0200; I am moving back to the states in April and want to know what kind of cable I should buy for my antennas. I am familiar with the old standard RG-58, RG-8, and RG-213, but don't know anything about th; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00772.html (7,934 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question on Coax Cable (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:37:08 -0400; I have been using some stuff that is the same size as RG-8 and is called "buryflex". It is low loss and seems excellent. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, North Carolina 28; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00773.html (9,395 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question on Coax Cable (score: 1): Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:46:21 +0200; Tnx Carl. I just read the reports on eHam. The stuff looks very good. For the outdoor piece, I want to buy various lengths with the connector already soldered and weatherproofed. However, it looks li; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00774.html (10,620 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question on Coax Cable (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell K3NC <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:22:57 -0400; When we moved back from belgium I brought a spool of the aircell coax with me! Also, I have seen it advertised in CQ magazine somewhere. If you like it, why not stick with it? Neal Campbell K3NC neal; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00777.html (12,227 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question on Coax Cable (score: 1): Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:06:57 +0200; Hi Neal, Well the reason is I want to pick one or two standards and stick with them. Here I got rid of everything except Aircell 7 about 15 years ago. That way I needed only one size PL plugs, etc. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00778.html (13,995 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question on Coax Cable (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:07:12 -0600; For use on 80/40/20 in a 50' run, you won't detect a significant power loss in RG58 compared to these fancier coaxes. Their loss on HF is insignificantly better than plain old RG58. You would prefer; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00779.html (10,583 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question on Coax Cable (score: 1): Author: "Mike Pagel" <k9uw@wi-net.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:33:18 -0500; Hi Rick: Try http://www.ssbusa.com/ham.html they're in Mountaintop, PA and list Aircell 7 for sale on their web page. The potentially scary thing is that their web page was last updated in 2003. Stil; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00780.html (9,476 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question on Coax Cable (score: 1): Author: K5XS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:52:22 EDT; Rick, I have had great luck with Cable Experts CXP1318FX (_http://www.cablexperts.com/cfdocs/cat.cfm?ItemGroup=1&itmsub=0&bskt=0&USA_ship=1&c=0_ (http://www.cablexperts.com/cfdocs/cat.cfm?ItemGroup=1; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00781.html (8,675 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]