Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Question\s+to\s+the\s+group\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Question\s+to\s+the\s+group\s*$/: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: <ka9egw@ka9egw.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:09:44 -0500; I note that the maximum to minimum capacitance ratio of vacuum caps has it all over air variables, and I feel that has real merit for a super wide range link tuner of the JVM/Anneke sort, but I am af; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00178.html (11,678 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: Gary J FollettDukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:13:24 -0500; Antennas and tuners are fun. They are about the last bastion in which hams can still perform meaningful experiments and produce publishable results. Radios have simply gotten complex to the point at; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00179.html (14,055 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:14:33 +0200; Hi Gary, I found time to come back in and continue addressing more of the points. Nothing is wrong with the resonant antenna. It is what I have used quite a lot over the years. We are on the same pag; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00181.html (21,033 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: Gary J FollettDukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:45:53 -0500; Great response Rick! I think it would be hard for me to come up with a photo of my Siamese dipole though ASPCA and all... 73 Gary _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list T; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00182.html (23,674 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: Gary J FollettDukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:54:31 -0500; Of course, my Siamese cat-tenna will only operate in the Morris Code portion of the bands. LOL Gary _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00183.html (23,323 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:26:44 -0500; Hi, Anyone want to compare the Johnson matchbox to a model 254? Thanks, Tim KE4KE Time and again we saw that at field day when using a Johnson Viking Matchbox 275w with two different openwire fed ant; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00184.html (12,211 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:45:45 +0200; Paul, your antenna is the best practice of how to build it. One single wire (per side) from matchbox to end insulator. Too often we get hung up here on "best practice (but impractical)" vs. "practica; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00185.html (13,894 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:50:54 +0200; Jim, In about 2010 the ARRL tested 3 remote tuners. I could never find that test. Searched on and off for years. Finally found it a couple of months ago and began updating my Excel file with this dat; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00186.html (10,246 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 18:00:54 +0200; FULL AGREEMENT GARY, EVERY WORD. RECOMMENDATION TO ALL: if you can find a good JVM, buy it. You'll never regret it. WARNING: More than half of the JVM's I have seen at hamfests were garbage on the in; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00187.html (15,223 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:19:03 -0500; Rick, Just to clarify here - when you say "if you can find a good JVM, buy it" - are you referring to the 275W or the KW version, or both? TNX/73, Al _______________________________________________ T; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00188.html (16,734 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:12:56 -0400; Well, not to beat a dead horse, but I've always been partial to Nye-Viking MB-V-A tuners. I have several and they have been able to tune most anything. They're a bit touchy at the low end of 80M and; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00189.html (16,577 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:02:19 -0500; With the hints you provided, it looks to me like it would be March, 2010, pp. 64 and 46-52. There are references to articles in May, 2004 and August, 2006 also dealing with remote autotuners. Thanks.; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00190.html (11,403 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:40:06 +0100; I'm new to this discussion, so if the following point has already been made I apologise: Link-coupled tuners do _not_ inherently provide good common-mode current rejection. If the design includes a g; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00194.html (11,035 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:52:22 -0400; Commonwealth Office for use in overseas embassies - this was one of the plug-in coils: http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/temp/coil.jpg. Steve, Looks like it used BC-610 coil sets? If not, they appear nea; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00196.html (9,824 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:56:09 +0100; Paul, Tom, W8JI, made the same comment a few years ago; however I've seen these coil sets being made in the FCO manufacturing facility. Of course the design could have simply been copied from the BC-; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00197.html (10,509 bytes)
56. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 07:18:57 +0200; Whichever power level you need... But clean ones are very rare. They are all 50 or 60 years old now and many have been abused. 73 Rick, DJ0IP Rick, Just to clarify here - when you say "if you can fin; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00211.html (17,771 bytes)
57. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:32:38 +0200; Thank you for clarity on that point, Steve. The ANNECKE and JVM both indeed ground the center of the double-differential capacitor. This leaves only the BPF feature of the link coupled matchbox as it; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00214.html (12,229 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: "ChasW3KC" <w3kc@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:36:50 -0400; Regarding a good, versatile antenna tuner - I have for many years used and recommend the vintage Harvey Wells Z Match. http://www.swedeart.com/harvey/html/z-match.html 73 Chas W3KC __________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00224.html (9,949 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: "Bob Good" <k4bg@planters.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:30:57 -0400; I certainly agree and enjoyed mine for about 22 years beginning in 1960 as I recall. I did install veneer drive dials to the caps. Of course I now have a T-T 238B and the J V 275 "Matchbox" as well.; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00230.html (11,226 bytes)
60. Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 22:34:26 +0200; You dinosaur you, Chas! Yes of course that is a fantastic Z-Match antenna tuner, well suited for openwire fed antennas... but at least 5 or 6 of us here in the group will win Mega-Bucks before you ev; /archives//html/TenTec/2016-07/msg00231.html (11,397 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]