Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OakGrigsby\s+Optical\s+Encoder\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OakGrigsby\s+Optical\s+Encoder\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OakGrigsby Optical Encoder (score: 1): Author: adb1x1@yahoo.com (Anthony Bowyer); Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:00:14 -0800 (PST); I happened to run across someone offering OakGrisby Optical Encoders on eBay. These are similar to the one's used in the 301 remote tuning kit Ten-Tec offered at one time. The one in the kit was 90Q1; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00357.html (7,148 bytes)
2. [TenTec] OakGrigsby Optical Encoder (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:46:53 EST; The encoders in the three kits I still have were quite different physically from the ones in the factory 301 s I have, or in the Omni's. The kit encoders were very similar to a Clarostat 2 Watt poten; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00358.html (7,050 bytes)
3. [TenTec] OakGrigsby Optical Encoder (score: 1): Author: adb1x1@yahoo.com (Anthony Bowyer); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 05:18:25 -0800 (PST); Pete, The Oak Grisby part number I got from someone with one of the 301 kits. I assume Ten-Tec made some part changes along the way. It looks to be of good quality, but I'm sure it's expensive if pur; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00362.html (8,237 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]