- 1. RE: [TenTec] Occupied Bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:30:39 +0100
- Jim, I haven't read that yet, but I have a question. Perhaps you are correct that it will be a bandwidth hog, but perhaps not. It is likely true that the single signal needs a wider bandwidth, but ca
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00417.html (9,358 bytes)
- 2. RE: [TenTec] Occupied Bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric F. Richards" <efricha@dimensional.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:44:20 -0700
- The bandwidth issue was addressed in the review of the AOR product in 2/2004 QST. At 11:30 PM 2/13/2004 +0100, you wrote: Jim, I haven't read that yet, but I have a question. Perhaps you are correct
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00419.html (10,471 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Occupied Bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:58:33 -1000
- Great, the Feb. QST will get out here to Kauai by barge by, at least, the second week of March!!! Could pay for airmail/1st class our here, but that is about double the dues cost. Perhaps the review
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00422.html (7,937 bytes)
- 4. RE: [TenTec] Occupied Bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 06:00:24 +0100
- Thanks Eric but I don't get QST over here. --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Eric F. Richards Sent: Saturday, February 14, 20
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00434.html (11,038 bytes)
- 5. RE: [TenTec] Occupied Bandwidth (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric F. Richards" <efricha@dimensional.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:52:28 -0700
- Hi, Rick, The short version is that to provide 200 Hz-3.8 kHz audio response the ARD9800 uses only 2.4 kHz bandwidth. Many many sets of discrete subcarriers. Eric At 06:00 AM 2/14/2004 +0100, you wro
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00440.html (11,845 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu