Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+6\s+PTT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+6\s+PTT\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni 6 PTT (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 05:40:37 -0700 (PDT); Just noticed that when releasing PTT in my Omni 6 (opt 3) when in split mode, there is about a half sec delay in changeover to receive. No such delay when not in split. I never noticed this before, b; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00407.html (7,177 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni 6 PTT (score: 1): Author: troy_wideman@eee.org (Troy Wideman); Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 15:01:27 -0700; Barry, I just tried a test into the dummy load using split between bands and also within bands. With CW the rig will shift between bands - with a similar delay as you mention- but I cannot send CW ot; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00410.html (8,499 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni 6 PTT (score: 1): Author: pklein@2alpha.net (Peter A. Klein); Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 00:02:05 -0700; According to email I received from Scott Robbins at Ten-Tec, the bandswitching (particularly the low-pass filters) isn't fast enough for crossband QSK. You use the "Mute" jack at the back of the Omni; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00417.html (7,824 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]