Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+V\s+\+\s+VI\s+SSB\s+audio\s+filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+V\s+\+\s+VI\s+SSB\s+audio\s+filters\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Omni V + VI SSB audio filters (score: 1): Author: Randy Russe3ll <lord_russell53@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:33:23 -0800 (PST); Well, I just got an Omni V, 705 mic, and 761 pwr supply. It came in Ten Tec Box with all the padding, indistinguishable from a new radio. In the flush of the moment, and experiencing my first dose of; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00416.html (15,303 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni V + VI SSB audio filters (score: 1): Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:06:58 -0500; Hang on to those Inrad 2.8 filters! Why? Glad you asked ... I too have an Omni V (2 of 'em in fact). I've done a lot of A/B listening tests with the stock 2.4 vs 2.8 filters on SSB. This was done wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00440.html (9,957 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni V + VI SSB audio filters (score: 1): Author: Randy Russe3ll <lord_russell53@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:27:16 -0800 (PST); Thanks Keith, I Think you're right and I will try them first. I can always sell them in a couple of days if the results are not to my tastes. What you've just told me is what I had heard. Put the 2.8; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00445.html (12,469 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni V + VI SSB audio filters (score: 1): Author: "Darwin, Keith" <Keith.Darwin@goodrich.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:56:02 -0500; Randy, No the Omni V has only one optional 9 MHz slot. It is activated with the NAR button. You'll have to choose between a putting a narrow SSB or narrow CW filter in there. I have tried both the TT; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00527.html (9,151 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]