- 1. [TenTec] Omni V ssb reception (score: 1)
- Author: cburk001@juno.com (charles w burkhardt)
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 12:30:56 -0600
- I purchased an Omni V recently and it performs very well on cw. However I find it necessary to reduce the RF gain control significantly to clearly receive ssb signals. If I leave that control in max.
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00480.html (7,817 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Omni V ssb reception (score: 1)
- Author: nw9g@netusa1.net (W9SN)
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:26:37 -0500
- Being a lover of my Omni V, I'd say one of two things here on this. One you have your noise blanker on and turned up. Or there is an internal problem in the rig. I alway comment on how well the audio
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00482.html (8,933 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Omni V ssb reception (score: 1)
- Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin)
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:36:20 -0600
- project? through my stack Steve, Check this out: http://www.arrl.org/tis/bibs/keyer.html 73, dale, kg5u -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Admi
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00486.html (7,532 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] Omni V ssb reception (score: 1)
- Author: howard.smith@mixcom.com (Howard Smith)
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 17:57:57 -0600
- Hi Steve, The cw keyboard was in December 1997 QST. 'A Computer Keyboard CW Encoder' by Ron Alspaugh, W6NKS. I made a photocopy of the article, but never built it. Howard Smith WA9AXQ -- FAQ on WWW:
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00490.html (10,004 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] Omni V ssb reception (score: 1)
- Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk)
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:38:58 -0000 (GMT)
- Does the noise blanker work ?? I never found it useful, but it does cause distortion if you crank it up. Never had an audio quality complaint, but according to local stations, there is a difference i
- /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00503.html (11,669 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu