Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+classic\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+classic\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:47:28 +0000; <<<While its always nice to hear another Omni VI on the air whose owner loves it, I've never quite understood why they didn't outsell everything made by the import radio companies.>>> Various reasons; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00358.html (9,273 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: SS409SS@aol.com; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:56:19 -0400; For lack of a better example, I can say this.. As a young and silly ham I hadnt a clue what a good radio was.. I was more interested in bells and whistles and not what TT had to offer in the way of R; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00377.html (9,127 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:46:13 -0700; Hey Richy, Nice shot of you relaxing on QRZ.COM. You know quality. Your comments comparing the TS 850 say it all. If I had a guess, it would be that you've dealt with the public in some venue like 'h; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00385.html (8,410 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:51:49 -0700; For lack of a better example, I can say this.. As a young and silly ham I hadnt a clue what a good radio was.. I was more interested in bells and whistles and not what TT This is an interesting state; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00386.html (11,401 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:58:00 -0700; Interesting about the 850. I borrowed a TS-850 to use for the ARRL 160m Contest and it sounded like a cement mixer. I returned it the next day and used my K2 in the contest. (Note: that was during th; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00388.html (12,377 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: SS409SS@aol.com; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:32:46 -0400; Hey Ben, Tnx for the reply.. Please read the next guys comment to me on the reflector, its like I raped his wife or something.. He was highly insulted that I said the 850 is a cement mixer... He shou; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00391.html (9,491 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Lorona" <w6wqc@dslextreme.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:25:43 -0700; I am mildly surprised that one of the more valuable attributes of the Omni VI is that it is still (perhaps the only) rig that can still be worked on/repaired/modified by the owner. Try that on the te; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00393.html (8,050 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:25:52 -0700 (PDT); Richy N2ZD suggested "He (WA3JPG) should open up both ears so the shit can flow out evenly" Richy, what does this mean? I honestly can't get my mind around what you're suggesting, all offensiveness a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00394.html (8,176 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:30:24 -0700; I agree with this. Ten Tec builds in an amount of "user serviceability" that no other manufacturer (Elecraft does this now) has done for some long time. That has always been a factor in my choice for; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00396.html (9,003 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: OTAKEBI@aol.com; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:33:32 EDT; Clark, I am with you. I have both the Corsair II and an OMNI V and I will never let them go. Just the fact that I can fix my rigs at home while the Kenwood and Icom's of today have to go back to the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00399.html (8,306 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:02:12 -0400; Of course, the days of us opening up a rig and saliva start dripping from the corners of our mouth, with the antipication of digging into it to 'improve' it, basically are over. If you really want to; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00400.html (10,313 bytes)
12. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:07:13 -0700; It's worse than you describe, Dan. The fact is that most of the time the problems we incurr are intermittant. You send your YaeKenCom in for repair and 5 or 6 weeks later, (if you are lucky), it is r; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00401.html (10,992 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:07:54 -0400; Hey Richy, That's highly uncalled for. Clark has produced more useful information on various rigs, over the years, than the majority of us have collectively. He certainly does not warrant a comment l; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00402.html (8,869 bytes)
14. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:19:51 -0700; Richy, Clark's a straight shooter and your comment is OUT OF LINE! I feel you owe Clark an apology. TS-850: Currently, the absolute world record (all time high score - highest ever) for both cw and s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00403.html (11,491 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "EDWARD CRAWFORD" <w4wvw@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 02:01:50 +0000; I was going to just say "hit the road" but thought I could turn this into something positive. This has got to be the worst case to date of the "Reply" function of this reflector. Obvious private comm; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00413.html (11,126 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:37:44 -1000; I have a Kenwood TS-440 which I have put a lot of operating hours on, and got a lot of enjoyment from. It is certainly not a top of the line rig in performance. Nevertheless I don't regret buying it; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00418.html (10,067 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 07:16:13 -0700; I had in succession a TS 120, 430, 440 and 570D/G. All nice radios. In this mix I also had the TS 520 and 530. I also used a FT 757 and an IC 735. Between 85-2000 I was your average transciever user; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00424.html (10,342 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:02:44 +0000; <<<I sure was happy the first time I opened up my Omni VI. It's built the way a radio ought to be, in my opinion.>>> No, there really isn't a ham rig anywhere that is built the way they ought to be.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00426.html (11,210 bytes)
19. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: SS409SS@aol.com; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:58:33 -0400; Ok, after many flames (the post was intended to go private but went to the group) I went back and reread Mr. Turners answer to my opinion post and realized he wasnt being a stick in the mud as I susp; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00430.html (8,473 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1): Author: SS409SS@aol.com; Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:00:46 -0400; I will try this again, I sent an apology out last night. It wasnt posted to the reflector. see below: Ok, after many flames (the post was intended to go private but went to the group) I went back and; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00431.html (8,638 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]