Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+vs\s+Kenwood\s+TS\-2000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\+\s+vs\s+Kenwood\s+TS\-2000\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Kenwood TS-2000 (score: 1): Author: w9qp@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 04:41:25 +0000; I am having another debate with myself trying to decide between a used Omni VI+ or spend a few more bucks and get a Kenwood TS-2000. I do know the Ten Tec has a hotter receiver and is great on cw. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00195.html (7,143 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Kenwood TS-2000 (score: 1): Author: SS409SS@aol.com; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:02:34 -0500; We can only help you compare the HF aspects of both rigs as the Omni obviously lacks this feature. If convenience of having all bands is your bag the the TS-2000 may appeal to you more.. If having a; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00197.html (8,187 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Kenwood TS-2000 (score: 1): Author: w9qp@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:40:17 +0000; Richy: I appreciate the comments you made about the radios. I am going to give it a little more time before I decide. Thanks again. John W9QP -- Original message -- __________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00209.html (9,275 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Kenwood TS-2000 (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:07:46 -1000; There are a lot of performance reasons to choose the Omni-VI over the TS-2000 which no doubt others have already pointed out. In my opinion cosmetically the Omni-VI has it all over the TS-2000. I'm n; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00216.html (7,970 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]