Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+\/\s+\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+\/\s+\+\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: john <johnmb@nc.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 10:03:46 -0400; I have an Omni VI Opt 3 and it's the best radio I have owned, particularly with a full compliment of filters. I think you'll find it a world class CW radio. It doesn't have a fishfinder, but the fish; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00085.html (7,360 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: KEN RINDFLEISCH <rindfleisch457@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 08:08:53 -0600; I also have a omni vi+ eith all the filters and I agree with you a very good receiver thanks ,ken ke5nxo _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00086.html (8,176 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: Andrew Moore <andrew.nv1b@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:34:33 -0400; Omni VI / VI+ / etc... I've owned two in the past, loved them, but found the audio (CW) fatiguing to listen to. Kept wanting to change the pitch or tweak the VFO or filters to reduce the fatigue. End; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00087.html (7,265 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 13:29:13 -0500; That's very interesting. When I moved from my IC-765 to an Omni VI+ I was blown away by how smooth, quiet and easy the audio was to listen to, especially with the filters engaged. My ICOM was well kn; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00094.html (8,754 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:26:14 -1000; Hi Andrew, I am curious about your complaint about the receive audio on your Omni VI. I have read numerous complaints about the receive audio on Omni VI, yet I have not experienced anything bad about; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00096.html (10,116 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: Andrew Moore <andrew.nv1b@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 18:46:17 -0400; I don't think so -- I noticed it with both. I'm not sure how much DSP or noise reduction happens in the VI+, or the quietness of the receiver compared to what I'm used to, but something about it jus; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00098.html (8,283 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: Andrew Moore <andrew.nv1b@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 19:00:50 -0400; << At least one person has complained that since the receive audio passes though DSP system, even when you are not using DSP, it sounds bad all the time. I have been tempted to bypass the DSP (it sho; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00100.html (9,582 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Whitman" <wwhitman@fastmail.fm>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:23:14 -0500; For what it's worth, I used an Omni VI+ for about a year and didn't mind the sound on cw at all. However, my Omni VII definitely sounds smoother. 73 Wayne K4ELO -- Wayne Whitman Cell:270-282-3550 wwh; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00101.html (8,264 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:43:29 -0500; Ken makes some good points. I have owned 2 different Omni VI Plus radios, both equipped with a tummy full of filters. And there's been a Paragon II and a couple of original Paragon's across the desk.; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00104.html (12,415 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:26:43 -0600; Hi-Fi headphones are even worse because they often have wider responses than ordinary Hi fi speakers. Especially lows that expose the rumbles of IC-746 in the presence of nearby SSB signals. There wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00108.html (10,191 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: Steve Halliburton <wa2soc@hsix.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:11:35 -0400; My OMNI VI/3 exhibits "fatiguing" audio only when the RF gain is too high. Turn the RF gain up high and yes the audio gets tiring in a hurry. Turn the RF gain down to a sensible level (I don't think; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00112.html (10,065 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:40:33 -0500; I have both the Corsair II (and remote VFO) with 2.4k, 1.8k, 500, and 250 Hz filters and the Omni VI Plus with the same filters plus 1.8k and 500Hz filters in the second IF. I've had both receiving o; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00113.html (12,236 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: Andrew Moore <andrew.nv1b@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:45:37 -0400; selectivity and "rejection" when trying to work weak DX close to strong signals in a pile-up. That sums it up well. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00114.html (8,645 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: Edward Sylvester <navydude1962@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:57:45 -0700 (PDT); Hard to beat with the 600 Hz Roofing filter, too!! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00115.html (9,308 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:28:34 -0500; Simple, by reducing the RF gain for a given band and signal condition you are improving the signal to noise ratio. Thus it results in less for the ears and brain to filter out. The result is less fat; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00117.html (12,436 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: Steve Halliburton <wa2soc@hsix.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:34:24 -0400; Yes, that was precisely the point I was making. I tell the same thing to people who complain that the Corsair (for example) is "noisy". Sometime back in 1963 or so I learned to run the AF gain higher; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00118.html (13,452 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: Jeff <n3jbh@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 08:24:40 -0700 (PDT); I agree with a few others on the speaker selection. My stock in the radio speaker sounds sad and pinched. But i have a 8 inch Woofer in a box that i use for a external speaker and it is much more p; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00119.html (8,355 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 11:02:38 -0500; Most stock / in radio speakers do not direct the sound toward the operator but either upward or downward depending on speaker location. A separate speaker directed toward the operator works much bett; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00121.html (9,391 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI / + (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:46:33 -0600; There is probably a short spike on those leading edges. The time delay of the crystal filters after the gain controlled stages accompanied by the half cycle at audio delay for audio derived AGC lets; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-04/msg00124.html (11,170 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]