Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Plus\s+upgrade\s+\-Reply\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Plus\s+upgrade\s+\-Reply\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus upgrade -Reply (score: 1): Author: PEPLASTERS@mail.rkd.snds.com (Paul Plasters); Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 14:16:24 -0600; Well gosh Peter, now I almost feel bad! I went for the whole ball of wax. Was it worth it? I do not know yet. They said they would start it on the 27 of OCTOBER, and it already came back on the 29 of; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00267.html (10,362 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus upgrade -Reply (score: 1): Author: pklein@seattleu.edu (Peter A. Klein); Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 13:07:55 -0800 (PST); The extra 9 mHz filter may be worth it to some. I think a serious contester would want dual 1.8 filters for SSB, and either a 500 Hz or 250 Hz for CW. Or, if you're into RTTY contesting, the special; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00269.html (8,852 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]