Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+filters\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: John King via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:11:06 +0000 (UTC); It is not normal. Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec ____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00019.html (11,537 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <kenradiobrown@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 08:00:53 -1000; talking about the filters in the 6.3 MHz Band Pass Tuning IF. In that case there are no adjustments to be made. There are "T pad" attenuators hardwired on the board, intended to compensate for diffe; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00020.html (13,711 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:28:43 -0500; Hi John, No. I'd have to make one and send off list. The last photo I tried to send was too large and the message got tossed. If you have a manual, the variable capacitor C-31 shown the picture of th; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00022.html (12,826 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:34:25 -0500; Hi Barry, Ok. It's probably a PIN diode problem like Ken said in another post. I'll check those. Seems odd that the 2.4 Kc filter and the 500 Hz filter are both a couple S units lower output than the; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00023.html (11,626 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 22:02:32 +0000; I don't see how a PIN diode is going to result in abnormally high output. What would be a very interesting experiment is to pull all the 6.3MHz i.f. filters and simply jumper the in/out filter slot p; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00024.html (13,943 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:33:03 -0500; The 1.8 Kc filter has higher output than the 2.4 Kc or 500 Hz filters. That's why I was wondering if the PIN diodes for the 2.4 Kc and 500 Hz positions might be the problem. Would seem odd if that's; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00025.html (9,863 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 00:05:26 +0000; Are the 9 Mc filters in or jumpered with the correct jumpers for output? Gary - AB9M ________________________________ From: TenTec <tentec-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of Stan Gammons <s_gammons; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00026.html (10,976 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 19:24:59 -0500; Gary - AB9M Hi Gary, It has a 9 Mhz filter installed in the standard position. Best I recall it's a 2.4 Kc filter and I believe the gain jumper is on the 2 pins close to the center of the radio. Ther; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00027.html (9,078 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 00:59:46 +0000; The question then, is the jumper appropriate for the loss of the filter? I had a OMNI-6 plus for ten years (two optional 9 Mc filters) and changed them from 2.4 Kc and 500 Hz to 1.8 Kc and 250 Hz. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00028.html (10,625 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]