Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VII\s+on\s+TenTec\s+web\s+site\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VII\s+on\s+TenTec\s+web\s+site\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VII on TenTec web site (score: 1): Author: "Mark Kachel" <kachels@wi.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:35:45 -0600; TenTec has finally published the specifications for the new Omni VII. Looks impressive. Mark, N0OKS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00501.html (7,296 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII on TenTec web site (score: 1): Author: "Rich McCabe" <r.mccabe@ctiowa.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:16:01 -0600; Except for the IP3 spec. Not sure what's up with that. Looks and smells like a Jupiter II to me. 73, Kd0zv TenTec has finally published the specifications for the new Omni VII. Looks impressive. Mark; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00502.html (8,099 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII on TenTec web site (score: 1): Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:38:46 -0700; Sidetone and Spot levels are independently adjustable! Just what I'd like to see in the Orion someday. Bob NW8L _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00504.html (7,773 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII on TenTec web site (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:43:06 -0800 (PST); I don't know about that, +8.5 dBm at 2 kHz (where it matters most) looks pretty darn good to me. The FT-2000 is only -19/-22 dBm at that spacing per the ARRL test results. And the +13 dBm at 20 kHz i; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00506.html (7,725 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII on TenTec web site (score: 1): Author: "Rich McCabe" <r.mccabe@ctiowa.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:02:19 -0600; Well I honestly don't know in real world cases how big of deal it is. But compared to most modern rigs it is very poor at 20khz. Not to mention from what I have heard the FT-2000 is nothing to set an; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00513.html (9,269 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII on TenTec web site (score: 1): Author: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:47:09 +0200; Does it shout "Danger Will Robinson!" when the SWR gets too high? Say "the pain, the pain", when it receives sloppy Morse? Hears "that's a big QSL here", or "the very best of 73's"? :-) For those tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00514.html (8,531 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII on TenTec web site (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:04:55 -0800 (PST); I just looked through a few other QST reviews to get the 20 kHz spacing (20M band) IP3 results: Orion II +21 (preamp off), +10 (preamp on) FTDX-9000D +27 (preamp off), +15 (preamp on) IC-7800 +37 (pr; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00555.html (10,094 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]