Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OmniV\,\s+OmniVI\,\s+VI\+\,\s+option\s+1\/2\/3\,\s+and\s+all\s+that\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OmniV, OmniVI, VI+, option 1/2/3, and all that (score: 1)
Author: <k7gt@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:27:10 +0000
The OmniV was a first attempt at microprocessor controlled radio. It was only partially successful. Nonstandard computer interface, but a pretty good CW radio, etc. Fixed offset/sidetone at 600 Hz. O
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00949.html (9,444 bytes)

2. [TenTec] OmniV, OmniVI, VI+, option 1/2/3, and all that (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Williams" <rick.williams@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:44:32 -0800
My Omni V has both a CW offset LEVEL and PITCH control. The sidetone pitch IS adjustable. A few differences between the rigs include: the Omni V does not have an RIT - the Omni VI does. The Omni V ha
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00978.html (9,089 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] OmniV, OmniVI, VI+, option 1/2/3, and all that (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:37:51 -0000
cAME FROM THE FACTORY LIKE THAT ? OR HAS BEEN MODIFIED? My Omni V has both a CW offset LEVEL and PITCH control. The sidetone pitch IS adjustable. A few differences between the rigs include: the Omni
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00979.html (9,949 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] OmniV, OmniVI, VI+, option 1/2/3, and all that (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Williams" <rick.williams@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:14:52 -0800
manual. The schematic for the "Sidetone Board (81362)" is on page 6-51 of the manual. The control pots for the "user adjustable CW PITCH and LEVEL" are located on the rear of the rig and shown on pa
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00980.html (10,901 bytes)

5. FW: [TenTec] OmniV, OmniVI, VI+, option 1/2/3, and all that (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Williams" <rick.williams@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:56:38 -0800
Ooopps! Steve (KB3MM) has pointed out to me that I may have misinterpreted the original discussion and the question seemed more likely to be related to the RECEIVED CW sidetone. So I stand corrected,
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01003.html (7,860 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu