Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+One\s+Day\s+to\s+Extra\s+Class\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+One\s+Day\s+to\s+Extra\s+Class\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] One Day to Extra Class (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:47:53 -1000; I am shocked at the following report from the ARRL! I am sending this to a fairly wide distribution with this question: is this where Amateur Radio really wants to be going? Or do you think the follo; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00573.html (9,748 bytes)
2. [TenTec] One Day to Extra Class (score: 1): Author: wmarvin@mnic.net (Wm Marvin); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 19:34:53 -0500; Hi Group, The down fall was when 20 WPM code was waived.....should have been INCREASED to 30 WPM and one tough technical written. I am ashamed to be a ARRL member, some of the things the ARRL endorse; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00574.html (7,795 bytes)
3. [TenTec] One Day to Extra Class (score: 1): Author: kd3pc@mindspring.com (dave dabay); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 22:00:06 -0400; Who is the wheat and who is the chaff?? What does the code speed have to do with ability and expertise?? What are you really wanting to say?? I look at this class as acceptance of the "rules" (whethe; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00577.html (9,487 bytes)
4. [TenTec] One Day to Extra Class (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 22:05:06 -0400; Keep on topic please. Ten Tec. Not antennas and code. There are other list for this stuff. Steve Ellington N4LQ. -- Original Message -- From: "dave dabay" <kd3pc@mindspring.com> To: "Wm Marvin" <wmar; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00578.html (10,655 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]