Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\'s\s+break\s+in\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\'s\s+break\s+in\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:09:20 +0000; FWIW, I get about 60wpm on my Orion and still enough unmuting between characters to just tell that someone is on frequency. That's external keyer, pc generated. I can't key fast enough to measure wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00228.html (9,385 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:06:13 -0500; At the risk of being labeled a "lid" - is there a handy explanation of how this QSK thing works, in practice, and how one uses it in daily life? I am going through a Code Course and looking to add CW; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00236.html (10,091 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:58:33 -0500; Hi James, QSK is the ability to still hear some CW signals (not to copy them) while you are actually transmitting. The receiver can actually come back alive in between each dit and dah. This allows y; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00240.html (11,556 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:05:43 -0500; Good question, and one that has been discussed over the years on this and other forums. Everyone who responds will have a different slant on it - here's mine. The meaning of QSK is that one can hear; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00241.html (13,234 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:26:10 -0600; And when polar path backscatter (reflection) or extreme long path propagation lets you hear your own CQ, you can almost work yourself with QSK. 73 es DX, Gary - AB9M Good question, and one that has b; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00242.html (13,603 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:58:19 -0500; Thank you, Carl, sounds like something I'm going to have to learn to use. == Richards - K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00243.html (9,520 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:36:42 -0500 (EST); I for one hate QSK.. It is very iritating to hear RX noise between chars & words. I use good old fashioned semi_break in. 73, Lee At the risk of being labeled a "lid" - is there a handy explanation o; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00251.html (10,808 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:25 -0500; It all depends on what you are doing. I find it very irritating to hear people continue to call while the DX station is transmitting because they can't hear while they are transmitting. For rag chewi; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00253.html (11,819 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:19:16 -0500 (EST); Carl, Yes...some ops have no kuth at all. I call 1 time & listen! happens a lot on SSB too. Just today...a DX station ask for the 9 station only and I bet 4 others kept calling. I guess they get thro; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00257.html (12,846 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:46:33 -0500; I once heard the famous ON4UN announce that anyone being rude by calling over other guys will be put on a list and he will not acknowledge them. I heard him keep that promise, too. First rate operato; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00260.html (9,712 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: art davis <n4uc@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:15:59 -0600; I'm sure. When I'm wearing headphones (no external audio), my wife can hear it in the next room! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00262.html (14,646 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:58:28 -0600; That's interesting to hear because I don't get such fast QSK with my O II. For CW I have it set as 0% delay, internal keyer off (I use an external unit just because) and CW rise/fall at 3 mS (as fast; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00285.html (10,633 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: "Robert Carroll" <w2wg@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:44:57 -0500; The reason I originally asked the questions below is that a friend of mine whom many of you probably know but I won't identify is a true blue high speed QSK guy. He can copy 65 wpm without breaking a; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00287.html (12,616 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:04:48 -0500; I just discovered that extremely fast QSK may *not* be a good thing whether its from a Ten Tec or not. On the K3, there's a "QRQ" menu option that allows for blistering fast QSK -- almost to the poi; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00289.html (11,692 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 54
Page: [1] [2] [3]