Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+\-\-\-\s+K2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+\-\-\-\s+K2\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: "Paul" <pfb@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:38:50 -0500; The comparison of a current production run Orion to an obsolete version of the K2 that has not been current for close to 2 years is not a very fair nor accurate comparison. The "New and Improved" ver; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00462.html (7,049 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 08:49:12 +0100; The Serial Number of the K2 that I used to compare with the Orion in my On-the-air-test is: 01316. (Just to preempt any questions). Rick The comparison of a current production run Orion to an obsolet; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00463.html (7,378 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 21:26:00 -0000; What type of improvements did they make ? Or is that info on their web site someplace ? The comparison of a current production run Orion to an obsolete version of the K2 that has not been current for; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00494.html (7,964 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: "Toby Deinhardt" <dj7mgq@muenchen-mail.de>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:57:14 +0100; Hi Steve, http://www.elecraft.com/news.htm (scroll down a bit) http://www.elecraft.com/manual/k2a2binstr.pdf http://www.elecraft.com/manual/k2%20rev%20B%20comp%20kit%20rev-1.pdf http://www.elecraft.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00497.html (7,896 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: "Paul" <pfb@adelphia.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 20:51:25 -0500; The K2 is a small rig with menu-driven adjustments (to keep the size down) and the ORION is a full size rig which is much easier to use than the K2. I can hardly perceive of anyone seriously contempl; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00509.html (8,092 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:55:03 +0000; Paul K8QT wrote: Again ..... comparisons can only be meaningful on current production runs to current production runs. NOT an "obsolete" version to "current" production version. Perhaps in a perfect; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00515.html (8,841 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:06:04 -0600; snip Perhaps in a perfect world you are correct but in a real world things don't usually work that way. The ARRL will perform product reviews when they are perform it.> It was my impression that the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00521.html (10,265 bytes)
8. RE: [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <royalct@inr.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:02:32 -0500; I think that I am a serious ham (love Dxing and Contesting)...... So serious that I am thinking about buying another Orion (to replace my Icom 775DSP) to sit next to my current Orion. My current Orio; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00529.html (10,429 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: "Paul" <pfb@adelphia.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:42:26 -0500; The K2 SSB on serial #3000+ is right up there with an Omni VI - the "new version" that has all the new mods incorporated and is properly setup has side band audio that is amazing! Some of us may even; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00541.html (7,958 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 12:02:54 -1000; The ARRL will perform product reviews when they are provided a review sample and when they have the resources available to perform it. Not in this world will they ever have the resources to keep re-t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00552.html (8,659 bytes)
11. RE: [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: "W1GOR" <W1GOR@maine.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:41:32 -0500; Ken, You are absolutely correct about the way the ARRL tests new gear... Somewhat like Consumers Reports... Buy the gear 'blind', test it, and sell it off to the highest bidder. 73, Larry - W1GOR I w; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00553.html (9,227 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]