Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+\-\s+Week\s+3\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion - Week 3 (score: 1)
Author: N0KHQ@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:21:12 EDT
Hello All, Have owned the Orion for 3 weeks now. The more I look at the Orion and use all the variable controls, the more I think to myself what an accomplishment by management and the R&D Team at TT
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00731.html (8,949 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Orion - Week 3 (score: 1)
Author: WB3LGC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:56:48 EDT
In a message dated 6/23/2004 7:22:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, N0KHQ@aol.com writes: 3. Now the MarkV, 200watts output, wont need an amp any more, yeah, but I just dont like the menu system. When I o
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00732.html (6,593 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Orion - Week 3 (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:33:12 -0400
I've owned two Mark V's. Kept them a total of 18 months, and sold them. I did not like the way the analog filters were arranged, and they were pricey as well. The existence of audio-level DSP seemed
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00750.html (7,990 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Orion - Week 3 (score: 1)
Author: N0KHQ@aol.com
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:05:28 EDT
I hear ya John. My slow retreat from analog rigs like the 756 proll and TS-850 began when I bought the Jupiter......still have it......its the Orion backup. I still have my TS-830S Gold Label, its ki
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00765.html (8,465 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion - Week 3 (score: 1)
Author: W4ABW@aol.com
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:51:34 EDT
How about the sub-receiver ? Is it the same excellent quality as the main receiver ? tnx Al W4ABW _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00766.html (6,817 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Orion - Week 3 (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:43:32 EDT
No, the Sub RX is not the same as the main. No roofing filters in the front end. But, I think it's still darn good. I have heard it is similar to the Jupitor RX? 73, Lee, KC9CDT _____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00773.html (7,031 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu