Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+2\s+situation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+2\s+situation\s*$/: 64 ]

Total 64 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: "leen3lpj" <leen3lpj@nep.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:39:42 -0400; During the winter I mentioned to a friend that I was expecting a new radio or sucessor to the Orion . A couple of months later people were starting to talk on this net about the same thing . Now we c; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00008.html (10,798 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: José Félix Ballester <jfballester@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:46:38 -0400; You have a point, but for us who already have an Eagle 73 to all de WP3HW Needs to have two separate receivers... Not sure the VII has that... Thanks, Cecil Acuff Gulfport MS K5DL From: José Félix Ba; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00009.html (9,118 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 16:47:53 +0300; Lets just hope the message could have been put out better . What they did say: 1. No more O2's. 2. It was unplanned. 3. They have enough spare parts to provide the level of support they have provide; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00010.html (8,341 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 16:59:08 +0200; Geoff, the sky is falling! Didn't you notice? ;-) Dunno why people always try to speculate more out of a message than what the originator put into it. My guess (and I have absolutely no information o; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00012.html (10,040 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 15:30:48 +0000; Rick, I think that's exactly what they'll do. OPTIONAL 2nd rx will also keep the entry price down. It needs a big display though. That's a main advantage of the Orion over the K3. To compete favorabl; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00014.html (11,662 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: denton sprague <denton@oregontrail.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 09:12:32 -0700; My take Dvi/hdmi for external displays.. Direct keyboard entry or keyboard/mouse/computer interface with bluetooth capability Built in antenna analyzer remote front panel If out socket I would love t; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00018.html (13,136 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 18:45:33 +0200; There is too much competition for knob-less radios, Denton. Besides Flex, there are half a dozen other companies producing good SDR radios here. It's nice to dream but keep in mind, the more gizmos y; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00019.html (14,986 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: "Lee WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:46:01 -0400; I'd vote for that! :-) I doubt that will happen, although they could reduce the cost of the radio by eliminating the control panel and displays. Maybe design their next high end rig like the Jupiter; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00020.html (9,091 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: tony <tonydicenzo@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:40:29 -0400; I believe there would be a sizable market for an Orion 3 if it were similar in capability to the new Kenwood TS-990S and priced around 5K. There are a lot of current and former TS-940/930/950 owners; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00022.html (8,155 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:53:54 +0000; I wouldnt count Icom out... Its about time to hear something from them on a high end box. Im told it may be a Flex style rig with a front panel. Right now their money radio is the 7600...its a decent; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00028.html (9,531 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:07:19 +0200; Cecil, the only reason Icom is making money is we have far too many people amongst us who couldn't tell a good radio from a bad radio, from a pile of that stuff laying on the barn floor. Unless Icom; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00030.html (11,219 bytes)
32. [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: Roger Rippy <svtincup@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:26:04 -0700 (PDT); Do you suppose anyone at TT reads the posts on this list? After two days and a substantial number of posts, rumors, and speculation, wouldn't you think someone from sales and marketing would wade in; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00032.html (7,766 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: MARY DOUGLAS <mmdtodwd@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 14:44:56 -0500; I hope the sales and marketing types, both here and Ten Tec will go back to the October 1983 issue of QST and look at the performance figures for the Yaesu FT-102. Receiver dynamic range was 95-102 a; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00033.html (8,723 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: Joe KX4JR <kx4jr@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:51:00 -0400; On 7/1/2013 3:26 PM, Roger Rippy wrote: Do you suppose anyone at TT reads the posts on this list? After two days and a substantial number of posts, rumors, and speculation, wouldn't you think someone; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00034.html (8,098 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:57:08 +0000 (UTC); Of course John Henry reads this list. But, why should he or anybody else wade in. The original memo from TenTec was quite clear. There's no reason to reply to all this speculation until TenTec is goo; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00035.html (9,020 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 22:46:13 +0200; Well I will agree that it was a great radio and certainly the cream of the crop of the hybrids of that day (all transistors except for tubes in the driver and final - 3x 6146B). Unfortunately I must; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00036.html (11,845 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:53:18 +0000; On 7/1/2013 19 26, Roger Rippy wrote: Do you suppose anyone at TT reads the posts on this list? After two days and a substantial number of posts, rumors, and speculation, wouldn't you think someone f; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00037.html (8,458 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: Greg S <oldlongbeard@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 14:19:28 -0700 (PDT); +1 Dave. And I think it wise on their part. I work at a place that makes electronic parts for automobiles, and it has been VERY "different" sourcing parts over the last few years. The parallels to Ra; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00039.html (8,641 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:07:59 -0500; These days the production lifetime of semiconductors is extremely short compared to the life time for tube designs back in the day. When key integrated circuits or custom designed chips are no longer; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00040.html (9,916 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:59:24 -0700; I'm not an RF engineer (or any kind of engineer, for that matter), so please excuse the dumb question. What's the problem with 12V, and what are the advantages of going to 24v or even 48v? Quieter de; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00043.html (9,352 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]