Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s+Reviews\?\-Follow\s+up\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "David Hammond" <dhhdeh@concentric.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:39:16 -0500
Hi Everyone, Thanks to all of you who responded to my posting both on and off the reflector. Keep those review and comments coming! BTW I guess Ten Tec was reading my (our) posts of late. They just p
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00099.html (6,770 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 18:51:32 -0700
The great thing about the II is that the number of REAL issues, compared to the kinds of thins that bugged us when the original Orion was shipped, are neglibible. Gary and company have done a great
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00103.html (8,622 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Waites" <BARBIEKENW@peoplepc.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 23:15:56 -0700
Wacky Weed? Nice technical discussion of the Orion and its reviews ! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00120.html (7,175 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 05:12:40 -0800 (PST)
Correct, Not sure why ancient mode is still used. I realize guys built surplus stuff that could only use AM. Give me a break, why would any rig today even have it? Double the bandwidth and a fourth o
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00126.html (10,365 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 13:20:52 +0000
I don't do much AM, but when the sunspots were here I would get on 10M AM at 29-29.1Mhz. There's plenty of spectrum up there. Sometimes on topband also at 1905, where there's also plenty of room. I j
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00127.html (8,578 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Klingler" <n8zx@tds.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:30:57 -0500
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00139.html (11,383 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:17:07 -0800
Because I use it. Ron Castro Chief Technical Officer Results Radio, LLC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00146.html (11,667 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:47:58 -0700
2.028 did not intentionally remove AM. Something likely went awry in the transmit gain change that was made in 2.026, and regression testing missed the fault. As to your views on AM in general, you'
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00179.html (8,767 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Fleming" <W3GQJ@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:18:47 -0500
Grant, I look at it as some people insist on still running DOS programs while most people use some type of GUI interface. In time, both spark, AM, and DOS will disappear. 73, John 2.028 did not inten
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00180.html (9,066 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:09:36 +0000
And cw too, eh John? 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00181.html (8,516 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:22:37 -0800
One uses the term "both" when referring to two items, not three or more items. You can correct the grammatical error by removing "AM" from that last sentence :-) Grant/NQ5T _________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00186.html (8,727 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:47:13 -0500
I would be really interested to know what TT's regression (and beta) testing involves. Odd that one of the primary (?) operating modes stops working and they don't notice. Maybe it's my imagination,
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00188.html (9,446 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Fleming" <W3GQJ@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:51:09 -0500
I thought it was for spark and AM! DOS is hidden behind the GUI. :-) One uses the term "both" when referring to two items, not three or more items. You can correct the grammatical error by removing "
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00189.html (9,488 bytes)

14. [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "David Hammond" <dhhdeh@concentric.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:13:37 -0500
Hey Guys, Since I started this thread, can I ask that we refocus again onto the pluses and minuses of the Orion II? What else besides AM has 2.028 corrupted? Anything? Any insight as to what the new
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00191.html (8,643 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:55:26 -0800
Yes. If you were around here when the original Orion was released, you probably notice how "quiet" the list is about bugs in the II. For a time, it seemed there were firmware updates coming out hour
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00192.html (9,264 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:04:06 -0800
Indeed the Mon function works fine on the O2, although as some have pointed out, it's not very loud. Perhaps with higher impedance headphones it might sound louder. I have been using the external spe
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00194.html (11,158 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:51:39 -0600
What about CW? 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00198.html (11,236 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 06:51:04 -0800
Some things are just forever :-) I think it will continue to be fostered in a contest context at a minimum, even after the requirement is eliminated. At least for a time. The numbers of active CW op
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00201.html (9,618 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:38:36 -0600
And OH MY, how we as humans do resist change. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tent
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00202.html (10,544 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Ron" <ron@morell.us>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:59:36 -0700
Dave, Near as I can tell the only thing broke is the AM transmitter and the AM monitor. All other functins seem to work FB here in the applications I use. CW, Digi modes, SSB, Shortwave listening, al
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00212.html (9,439 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu