Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s+S\s+meter\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion II S meter (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Waites" <BARBIEKENW@peoplepc.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:56:18 -0600
Well , speaking only for myself, I will not worry one second about S-meter accuracy -- if there is such a thing. I think S meter readings are as important as the signal report you get during a contes
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00845.html (7,324 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Orion II S meter (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:22:01 -0500
Ken, I agree with your statements, but would like to point out that it doesn't have to be that way. If you borrow a top quality calibrated signal generator, or spring for one of the Elecraft receiver
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00849.html (9,022 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Orion II S Meter (score: 1)
Author: Phil Howlett <w9xx@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:22:57 -0500
Some have been kicking about the Orion II's S-meter reading this morning. To satisfy my own curiosity, I hauled out a Boonton signal generator and made some measurements at 14.200 of signal level vs
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00862.html (7,773 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion II S Meter (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:42:13 -0500
As Phil measured, the meter is overly dramatic above and below s9 - here's correct readings with actual readings in parentheses uV S-Meter 5 s5.7 (s3) 15 s7.3 (s6) 50 s9 150 s9+10dB (9+20dB) 500 s9+2
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00863.html (8,915 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion II S Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:09:30 -0500
A quick check is to tune in a steady S9 carrier and then switch in 6, 12, and 18 dB attenuation. That should give you S8, S7, S6, respectively. I've found pretty fair agreement on my (classic) Orion.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00874.html (8,349 bytes)

6. [TenTec] ORION II S meter (score: 1)
Author: <emoss98133@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 15:41:00 -0700
Thanks to all that have replied on & off the list. Ron, wish I had seen your list of needed correction B4 posting, Shame that this has been a problem from day 1 with the Orion. hope we don't have to
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00015.html (6,725 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Orion II S meter (score: 1)
Author: garyh <k4mt1950@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 03:44:32 -0500
Th S meter zero is proper when the radio is turned off. When its on the S meter reads about S3 even with RF gain at 100. I noticed in the schematics a meter adjust pot on the A7 ADC schematic R 340.
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-02/msg00055.html (6,665 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Orion II S meter (score: 1)
Author: Dukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:14:36 -0600
R340 on the A7 board is an A to D sensitivity adjustment for the meter, as you had surmised. However, it acts to adjust both the S meter sensitivity (at full scale) AND the TX power meter at 100 watt
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-02/msg00056.html (9,640 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Orion II S meter (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:19:16 -0500
With the latest 566 firmware ( v3033xE11), the "Other" menu provides the option for the S-meter action to be independent of AGC, so choosing this will take AGC out of the equation. If the TX power me
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-02/msg00057.html (11,042 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Orion II S meter (score: 1)
Author: Dukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:34:00 -0600
Thanks for that update Barry. I have to yet visited firmware v3033x11 but will with the O2 that is arriving today. That is, if the version at TenTec.com will run. I have had difficulty with the Omni
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-02/msg00058.html (12,133 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Orion II S meter (score: 1)
Author: garyh <k4mt1950@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:46:36 -0500
Dukes Hifi your absolutely correct. I tried that adjustment and quickly saw the power output reading was wrong. I hooked up my wattmeter and set it to agree with actual power output. I then played wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-02/msg00059.html (8,405 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu