Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s+and\s+2\.031\s+NR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s+and\s+2\.031\s+NR\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:13:57 -0700; Anyone other than myself notice the significant distortion of the audio, ssb and CW, when the nr is engaged at either 1 all the way to 9? Another observation is that the volume levals are off now. 1/; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00143.html (8,473 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:23:16 -0600; So what did they say was "different"? Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00144.html (8,472 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Don and Diana Cunningham" <wb5hak@duracom.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:24:35 -0600; Doug, I have not yet gone to the "new" firmware, just looking at what is said on here. It hasn't been much, so far!! I don't care for the NR on any of the versions I have seen, either with my origina; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00145.html (9,240 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:25:51 -0600; Do you mean 2.031? Yes, why wouldn't it be? Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00147.html (8,544 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:29:38 EST; Doug, OH yes you are correct. There is some major problems. We have been talking about them most of the evening... Did you read the earlier posts? Very interesting. What amazes me is some folks are t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00148.html (8,885 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Don and Diana Cunningham" <wb5hak@duracom.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:30:29 -0600; Well, Grant, it isn't worth it to me at this point in the learning curve if it doesn't actually help anything. I'm happy so far with what I see, why would I want to add yet another variable?? Just my; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00150.html (8,636 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:31:10 EST; Grant, It is not that robust high quality audio we had before. AND it has dsp noises now & then. Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://l; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00151.html (8,214 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:32:23 -0700; Well, I am not sure Don. I liked the idea of the hung picel going away or atleast that it isn;t a hardware issue. The sweep does appear to be better at indicating signal location...still a bit off th; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00152.html (10,832 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:39:52 EST; WOW, this blows my mind.... I understand the kind of SW they are working with and after reading the change history you would not expect much to have changed at all on this last update, unless they di; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00154.html (8,342 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:41:18 -0700; I reported it already. I know they are trying and I think they are doing a fantastic job. It might be time for a beta test group effort so that these threads don't hurt the positives of this radio. B; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00155.html (10,366 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:42:38 -0700; I am kinda guessing a few things didn't get listed...wink wink! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00161.html (9,093 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:50:39 -0800; I haven't noticed any of that. I'll check the frequency response on SSB when I get a chance. Ron Castro Chief Technical Officer Results Radio, LLC _______________________________________________ TenT; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00164.html (9,556 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:50:38 EST; Doug, A very good post! Yes, I believe they are trying. Yes, I think they need beta testers as it seems they do not have the resourse to do the testing. What a great radio, it just needs to work the; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00165.html (8,320 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:02:08 -0700; It's time to bring Doug back for a short blip. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00174.html (9,468 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 23:12:34 -0700; I will say in defense of the NR on v2.031, there is a substantial difference in the noise floor between the settings 1 through 9. The noise almost disappears at 9. However, the artifacts in the recei; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00176.html (10,075 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:46:46 -0600; Lee, I know it's not obvious to non-practitioners of the art, but firmware is like sausage - you don't want to see it being made. Unfortunately, that is what is going on here - we're in the middle of; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00206.html (9,363 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Orion II and 2.031 NR (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:17:15 EST; Duane, YES, I understand and I feel the same way. It's ok if it takes a little while and some effort. One nice thing is if you like the previous version you can go back. 73, Lee _____________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00208.html (8,101 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]