Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+III\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+III\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Able2fly@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:27:55 EDT; An Orion 3 with good front-ends for both Main and Sub that could be phaselocked would give me what I want for True Diversity, but it would cost $5-6k. 73, Bill W4ZV __________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00382.html (6,638 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Don Prater" <w4to@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:12:44 -0400; Bill, I would vote for that too. 73...Don...W4TO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00407.html (7,676 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:53:26 EDT; What took so long for the name O-III to make an appearance? Who do I send MY wish list to? /K3UJ An Orion 3 with good front-ends for both Main and Sub that could be phaselocked would give me what I w; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00408.html (7,462 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 23:56:21 -0400; And you can have stereo transmission, too! 73 Martin AA6E _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00415.html (7,210 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Tony Lelieveld" <va3dwi@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 11:12:51 -0400; Hi all, I agree. I'd go with an external panadapter. Why are people rumbling about an Orion III? Let's get the O-II finalized first. I am still waiting for an upgrade that will improve the NR part of; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00103.html (7,970 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 11:37:57 -0400; The NR you are talking about does not exist on any radio. Still to this day I have never seen an NR that truely helps with copy. They might make things quieter but copy is always best under difficult; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00104.html (8,914 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 11:56:14 -0400 (EDT); Well...intersting and true, IMHO...as well so here is the deal.. I have the OII...and I love it for many reasons..... But, if you want a quiet rcvr...get a Drake R-4B, Collins 75s-3, Hallicrafters SX; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00105.html (9,423 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Bob Good" <k4bg@planters.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 11:58:44 -0400; Noise Reduction "NR" : I mostly agree with Carl. My gear is Omni VI Opt-3 and opt-1 on a second unit. SSB is a significantly "modified" sound making it more difficult to understand due to the lack of; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00106.html (10,832 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: k3miy@csonline.net; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 12:29:33 -0400; A correctly used bandpass filter will beat any noise reduction scheme. Ron K3MIY -- This mail sent through CSOnline Webmail http://webmail.csonline.net _______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00107.html (10,421 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 12:18:28 -0400; I was only talking about SSB. For CW, the tightest filter you can use without distortion helps the best for noise. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, NC 28635 www.n4py.com _________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00108.html (11,749 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 16:30:58 +0000; I agree with much of what has been said downplaying NR. I've never met a NR that I liked (O6+,1000MP,Orion,K3,etc) - just use the radio's filters and the neural processing you were born with. If you'; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00110.html (13,009 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 12:35:14 -0400 (EDT); I am mostlly a CW operator, and find that the Orion II NR (v2.044A), with a wide (6 kHz) roofing filter (tnx Bob, K8IA, for that tip) does help pull out the weak ones on 160 and 80 meters. I don't ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00111.html (9,380 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Don Jones" <ko7i@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 12:45:02 -0700; DITTO! Excellent on CW, SSB not a big improvement here on my 6 opt 3 too. Don Jones Arlington, WA Noise Reduction "NR" : I mostly agree with Carl. My gear is Omni VI Opt-3 and opt-1 on a second unit.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00112.html (11,533 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 15:48:32 -0400; Hi Guys -- I often use NR to advantage on SSB, and it can make a substantial difference in reading SOME weak, noisy signals. HOWEVER... one's satisfaction will depend entirely on his level of expecta; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00113.html (8,975 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 15:52:48 -0400 (EDT); So, Maybe what we users are asking for is a menu-selectable NR algorithm, one optimized for CW (similar to the present one) and the other for SSB. A software issue, not necessarily requiring a new ra; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00114.html (11,436 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Greg S <oldlongbeard@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:02:31 -0700 (PDT); Richards, I echo your comments. I use the built in DSP of my Omni VI+, with it's full load of I.F. filters (including the roofing filter from Inrad), as well as it's PBT, and manual notch, constantly; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00115.html (10,595 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 16:21:54 -0400 (EDT); RF gain & AGC setting do more here on the OII than NR ever does...just like the old days...somethings never change?? The NR just builds a filter around the signal to remove noise...so BW adjustment i; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00116.html (9,964 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 22:57:32 +0000 (UTC); Gee, just like TenTec says in the manual. Yeah, you gotta play with it a lot to figure it out Dave WA3F RF gain & AGC setting do more here on the OII than NR ever does...just like the old days...some; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00117.html (10,810 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "jack b friend" <jfriend31@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 21:21:35 -0600; NR on CW takes most of the noise completely out here at AK7O. I run it at 3 all the time. signals pop out of the silence just like the days of the 75S3B! jack ak7o Hi Guys -- I often use NR to advant; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00119.html (9,789 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Frank Kirschner" <KF6E@mail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:50:15 +0000; Listen to the NR on the FTdx-5000. It can pull a signal out of the noise and make an unreadable signal readable, and a noisy signal armchair copy. This works on SSB as well as CW. I don't know what a; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00140.html (9,977 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]