Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+III\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+III\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:04:57 -0400; My Orion III would be an Orion II with the addition of a sub-receiver that is equal to the main receiver, a 9 mhz IF out jack, and receive antenna out/back in loop connections so you could add device; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00141.html (11,715 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:08:30 -0400 (EDT); I don't have a Yaesu 5000 to listen to, but I think all of us on this reflector with Orion IIs agree that the DSP NR needs further work. It works pretty well (for me at least) on CW, but there is muc; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00142.html (11,333 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:13:56 -0400 (EDT); Carl, I'd agree with that, with the possible exception of 6 meters if including it would affect performance on the other bands. John H? What do you think about that? 73 Ray In a message dated 5/18/20; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00143.html (11,508 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Charles Strickland" <wa4oss@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:33:56 -0400; Yes! Agree -- I could handle an "IQ" ouput in order to run Spectrum Analysis software on a pc. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00144.html (12,466 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:22:24 +0000; Nope, not all of us. In fact, if my O2 (or O3) was missing a NR button, I wouldn't be disappointed. As far as the NR in the FT5K magically making unreadable signals readable, I'd love to hear a recor; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00146.html (8,414 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:18:26 -0400; I agree completely with Barry. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, NC 28635 www.n4py.com _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://list; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00147.html (9,175 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 19:45:26 -0400 (EDT); Bsrry and Carl, We're all entitled to our opinions, based on our own experience. All I can say is the NR (2.044A and 2.039d) helps me pull out weak CW signals on 80 and 160, especially with a wide ro; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00149.html (9,100 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py2@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 19:53:44 -0400; That's exactly right. I'm just saying I can do better on CW by selecting the best filter for the conditions. And on SSB, I do better by selecting the best filter and PBT value for the conditions. You; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00150.html (9,882 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 08:29:32 +0200; And I tweak the RF gain in addition to what Carl said... People seem to be, well, "spoiled" these days. They want to listen to 20 over 9 signals. Years ago, few people had amps or beams and most sign; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00151.html (11,161 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Joseph Tock <joseph.tock@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 06:21:39 -0400; My ideal OIII would include much of what has been discussed, but please make it MARS compatible, and not just around the band edges. I am a dedicated MARS member (with official orders) and operate on; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00152.html (12,068 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Joe" <joe@n4yg.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 06:45:11 -0500; Can do. Just let me know how far out of band you want to go on each end. Take a look at my web site, www.n4yg.com. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00153.html (13,173 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Joe" <joe@n4yg.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 07:07:28 -0500; Can do. Just let me know how far out of band you want to go on each end. Take a look at my web site, www.n4yg.com. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00154.html (13,149 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Tony Lelieveld" <va3dwi@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 09:23:58 -0400; Hi all, As the originator of this NR thread, I am not surprised by all the various reactions. One more comment on my part is that just recently a friend of mine who is new on HF had much difficulty c; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00155.html (13,597 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: "Frank Kirschner" <KF6E@mail.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:27:08 +0000; I've seen a couple of YouTube videos, but they don't do the process justice. Let me see if I can make a realistic recording of the audio. I'll have to figure out a place to post it. By the way, nobod; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00157.html (8,850 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 34
Page: [1] [2]