Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+Issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+Issues\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: Dave Sublette <k4to@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 10:36:23 -0500; Good morning all, I have been subscribed to this reflector for less than a week. I signed up because I am the owner of an OMNI VI+ and I am contemplating the purchase of an Orion. Just this morning I; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00279.html (7,793 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:26:14 -0500; Dave, I returned my Orion during the 30 day evaluation period. I will say first that I felt the receiver and transmitter performance were truly top notch. That said, why did I return the Orion? For m; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00287.html (13,790 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dennis.mcalpine@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:34:40 -0500; Mark, I would hate to see what u wud have said if u didn't like it. But, what did u go to in place of the Orion? A 756 Pro II? Sounds like if that was it u aren't totally happy with that either since; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00289.html (15,972 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:23:09 EST; In a message dated 1/9/2004 14:24:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, mark@microenh.com writes: I also found that the user interface was cumbersome in places. There are some functions that one uses frequent; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00296.html (9,028 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:53:26 -0500; At 03:23 PM 1/9/04 -0500, you wrote: Consider you are in a QSO and have adjusted the RIT (no one ever calls you back on frequency) the CUT/PBT and the BW. Now you finish with him and want to listen a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00297.html (9,494 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: JOHN <ku3g@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:16:46 -0800 (PST); i just can not believe how , and for lack of a better word, lazy weve become with our rigs, gee i have to push the button on the rit also, and boy it does take lots of efftort and time, cmon guys let; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00299.html (10,164 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:48:58 -0500; John, become with our rigs, gee i have to push the button on the rit also, and boy it does take lots of efftort and time, cmon guys lets get real It's not that we're lazy. If a user interface is well; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00300.html (8,204 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:49:09 -0500; Scott, putting I don't know if this has changed since I evaluated the Orion in August, but does the PBT / BW step automatically change with mode? It would be nice if the Orion remembered the last ste; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00301.html (8,540 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:53:54 -0500; Dennis, did u I haven't replaced the Orion yet. I'm 'making do' with my Omni VI (opt 3) and Pegasus. BTW, I didn't mean to imply that I was unhappy with the Pro II. I was just contrasting Icom's (and; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00302.html (8,074 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:17:02 -0500; I don't know if this has changed since I evaluated the Orion in August, but does the PBT / BW step automatically change with mode? It would be nice if the Orion remembered the last step setting. I fo; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00303.html (8,168 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:03:33 -0800 (PST); Mark suggested "Does the PBT / BW step automatically change with mode? It would be nice if the Orion remembered the last step setting." As well as Encoder rate - step/encoder rate go hand in hand. So; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00304.html (8,422 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: Al Baker <w5iz@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:32:32 -0800 (PST); I have read this thread with great interest and want to say I love my Orion. It is a thinking person's radio...and I have been forced to reengage my brain when operating it. I have also enjoyed all t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00307.html (8,800 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:46:15 -0600; I can't help but wonder why we keep rehashing the early issues with the Orion? There must be some glee or self justification or something in doing that I suppose. The Orion is not the radio it was la; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00308.html (20,598 bytes)
14. RE: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:58:40 -0500; John N1JM I can't help but wonder why we keep rehashing the early issues with the Orion? There must be some glee or self justification or something in doing that I suppose. The Orion is not the radio; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00309.html (21,673 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:39:26 EST; I Love my Orion too! I have had NO Failures with it so far ( about 7 weeks now). Yes , I have made some sugestions on things to make it better. And I beleive they (TT) are listening to us. I am hopef; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00315.html (8,377 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Orion Issues (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 04:15:49 +0000; <<<I use it for DX work, not contesting (Thats ok, isn't it?)>>> NO. Orion is restricted to Official CERTIFIED Contesters Only. Email your certification no. to Ten Tec Hq. at once or face immediate Z; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00318.html (8,830 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Orion Issues (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 05:15:18 -0000; Super! your here. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00323.html (9,645 bytes)
18. RE: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "Ron" <royalct@inr.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:01:51 -0500; Goodness, what a messy scenario.............. User Interfaces; the Orion is one of the best for such a complex rig that I have come across. I quickly learned the Orion's interface and do not forget w; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00327.html (11,861 bytes)
19. RE: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:09:12 -0500; To each his own, but for me the problems Mark outlines are not even close to sufficient to make me return the radio. I knew going in that the Orion is a cutting-edge product, but any significant adva; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00381.html (18,451 bytes)
20. RE: [TenTec] Orion issues (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:23:55 -0500; This is a good suggestion. I found 10 Hz steps too fine for RIT in contesting. Some CW ops call as much as 250 Hz off frequency, and it takes too many turns of the RIT knob at 10 Hz to bring them in; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00382.html (9,600 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]