Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+QSK\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 12:24:02 -0000
I managed to get the upgrade running. Had to close several programs. Probably some junk I picked up on the net! Got the Orion upgraded. First thing I noticed was how smooth the keying is now in the s
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00645.html (7,266 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 07:39:53 -0500
One thing noticed in general. If one has several applications running, problems may abound. These issues seem to less when running Windows XP or XP Professional. Earlier versions of Windows may not b
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00648.html (8,865 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Joseph Trombino Jr" <w2kj@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 17:06:19 -0400
Howdy fellow TenTec'ers: Interesting discussion going about QSK in the Orion with the new 1.370 version. In my OMNI VI/3, Argonaut II and Argonaut V the fastest QSK settings produced real QSK...that
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00691.html (8,526 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 22:13:54 -0000
Quote from Doug Smith's web site at www.doug-smith.net/orion.htm "Additional Bonuses for CW Operators Ten-Tec rigs have been legendary for their QSK; but this time, we have pulled out all the stops.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00692.html (9,991 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: Lee Crocker <w9oy@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 05:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Why is 100wpm QSK such a requirement for the Orion? There was a time I thought this was a real advantage, and I spent a lot of time making my radios and amps and accessories such as audio chain DSP b
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00155.html (8,135 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: " Gene Hawkins" <ka5cnt@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:11:30 -0500
Lee, well stated, two thumbs up. Gene Hawkins KA5CNT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00156.html (7,023 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:29:04 -0400
Lee, That statement was included with the 'wish list' that was floating on the reflector about a Ten Tec CW only 'wish' radio. So you interpeted it in the way you wanted, more than likely to be able
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00157.html (10,305 bytes)

8. RE: [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:45:36 -0700
Lee, I think the a rig needs to meet a couple of basic requirements at any and all speeds that man is capable of working at: 1. It should not cause key clicks! 2. It should not shorten the first dit
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00160.html (9,618 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: Lee Crocker <w9oy@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Tommy I think you miss the point. My start with QSK radios dates back to the Atlas 350xl, then to a Ten Tec Delta then an FT-1000D, a Pegasus and now an Orion, and a few home brew single banders in t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00170.html (10,099 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:02:16 -0400
Lee OK...well maybe we both missed each others point. My response to you was about your remark to the affect that if someone is asking for a rig to work full QSK at 100 wpm, are they just 'bragging'.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00283.html (14,645 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:55:08 -0400
I have loaded my buffer with text and keyed the rig at 100 wpm but it sounds almost like a continuous tone in the sidetone. I'm wondering how you could distinguish between the sidetone and someone br
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00285.html (16,877 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:52:45 -0400
Then I must be paranoid also because I can not sit with my back toward anything but the wall, in public. I have an advantage over you. I have been told (and more than one time too) that the reason I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00287.html (9,062 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Roy" <royanjoy@ncn.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:00:55 -0600
"...It is very iritating to hear RX noise between chars& words." Turn back that RF gain and use 100 Hz bandwidth. 73, Roy K6XK 'QSK forever' _______________________________________________ TenTec mai
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00282.html (6,531 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu