Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+Repaired\s+and\s+Back\s+to\s+V1\.373b5\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Merle Bone" <merlebone@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:07:18 -0600
I recently sent my Orion back to Ten-Tec with a problem I had been chasing for over 6 months. I had been running V2.062a while trying to find the cause of losing the main receiver and transmitter whe
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00356.html (10,076 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "fraz1" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:21:32 -0600
Thanks for the post Merle.....I still personally prefer v 1.372. Next would be v 1.373b5. One would think that with Elecraft moving forward, TT would be releasing some upgrades. _____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00357.html (11,716 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:37:04 -0600
Merle, I've been struggling with the "overdriven" audio sound ever since installing 2.062a. I also hope they get to this soon. The only solution I've found is to run both the NB and NR at between 1 a
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00358.html (10,885 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: Mark Erbaugh <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:59:57 -0500
TT Firmware is a sore spot with me. It's been years since they updated the Pegasus firmware. Last year (2006), they updated the Jupiter firmware with an additional narrow filter which is one thing la
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00359.html (8,276 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:23:13 -0600
On item that I've discovered with the current Omni VII on the desk, thus I no longer have the Orion II available, is that the RF Gain must be run lower, actually much lower, than one would expect. An
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00360.html (14,128 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Merle Bone" <merlebone@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:11:07 -0600
Bob - K4TAX said: "On item that I've discovered with the current Omni VII on the desk, thus I no longer have the Orion II available, is that the RF Gain must be run lower, actually much lower, than o
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00362.html (9,192 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:43:03 -0600
In ault analogue radios, over driven audio comes from wimpy AGC. AGC that's poor due to leaky AGC circuit bypass and time constant capacitors, sometimes from controlled tubes with grid emission that
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00366.html (10,518 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:48:59 -0600
THRESHOLD. A lot of people have forgotten it even exists since T-T merged some Threshold control with RF gain. The minimum value defaults to 1uv, but it can be set lower. Grant/NQ5T ________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00367.html (8,453 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: Martin Ewing - AA6E <aa6e@ewing.homedns.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:12:01 -0500
It may go against ham culture, but I suggested (long ago) that TT should sell a support contract for Orion firmware (and maybe hardware). That would help keep the development wheels turning. To me, i
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00368.html (9,323 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:36:14 -0800
This is probably a good time to review the problems I would most like to see fixed in the v. 2 firmware, especially in the Orion II: * S-Meter accuracy/linearity * Notch (automatic and manual) inside
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00369.html (10,529 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:36:09 -0600
There were a couple others of us who suggested this same thing. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com It may go against ham culture, but I suggested (long ago) that TT should sell
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00370.html (9,951 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Iddings <jeff@iddings.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:00:11 -0500
I don't own an Orion, but the notion of open sourcing the firmware would be amazing.. I suspect they won't do this for multiple reasons though. Jeff _______________________________________________ Te
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00371.html (11,397 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:06:49 -0600
I don't think we were talking about open-sourcing. This comes up every now and again. I don't believe TT will go for that as they believe they have considerable intellectual property tied up in it an
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00372.html (12,870 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: Al Baker <w5iz@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:29:30 -0800 (PST)
It is sure nice to see some traffic on the reflector...I thought the K3 had stolen all the attention. Unfortunately, the thread about firmware has started again despite Scott's earlier post that ther
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00373.html (9,282 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:02:06 -0800
The K3 will no doubt be a nice radio, although at best, it will equal the Orions in performance. That according to Eric Swartz, co-owner of Elecraft in a demo he gave at our local club last month. He
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00374.html (11,524 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:37:14 -0600
As I understand it, Tentec has a "non ham" project and it is one that basically "pays the bills". The bills that pay the folks, keep the lights on, and buys the components that produce products that
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00384.html (10,971 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: Al Baker <w5iz@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:56:14 -0800 (PST)
Let me understand that I bought 2 TenTec Orions, an Orion and an Orion II, and paid for them in full. The firmware has bugs years after the purchase. TenTec is aware of the bugs and I should wait for
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00385.html (9,203 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "fraz1" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:03:46 -0600
Al, FWIW, I agree that TT has work to do for their original Orion and Orion II customers. If they do not plan any additional revisions or upgrades, they should clearly state so. I have lost some conf
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00387.html (11,297 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:23:23 +0000
Maybe I just don't get it. I'm able to work very weak DX stations on 160m while they are snuggled up right next to a loud W station CQing. I can pick signals out of whopping QRN on the lower bands. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00388.html (10,773 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Orion Repaired and Back to V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: K5XS@aol.com
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:34:50 EST
I will confess some puzzlement myself. I bought an O-II almost a year. I love it. I have not updated the firmware, as it is fully functional in the modes I operate (CW, SSB, RTTY, PSK), and it beats
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00390.html (8,964 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu