Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+in\s+Contests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+in\s+Contests\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 06:59:41 -0500; W5YR wrote: Perhaps a more appropriate question is how many of the major contesters and big multi-multi stations use Ten Tec equipment? Hush George, we don't want them to learn about Orion! In the 20; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00370.html (9,500 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:25:41 +0000; While W5YR's question is a good one, reading the "fine print" leads me to believe the major JA companies provide not only equipment but substantial funding to favored DXpeditions. It is understandabl; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00372.html (7,050 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: "Ariel M. Elam" <k4aal@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:29:54 -0600; Great post, Pete. 73, Ariel, k4aal _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00386.html (8,214 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:33:29 -0600; I love posts like this ... helps me to understand how urban legions get their mysterious beginnings ... "substantial funding" ... WOW. Hey ... is it true that TenTec is really owned by Yaesu too? B-; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00399.html (8,901 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 21:10:09 -0500; Billy, The key words are "substantial funding" in the post. Now exactly how much is considered substantial? Actually, I think someone could write a good post (or article) explaining how certain DXped; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00403.html (11,143 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 21:30:07 EST; Ok, So no contest wins with TT equip? I find that hard to believe. Maybe I should be looking at sites devoted to contesting only for my answer. W4ZV's Numbers are impressive, considering who / what h; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00407.html (8,063 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:36:05 +0000; Actually, if you read the thread back to the beginning you will find the original question was how many DXpeditions use Ten Tec equipment. W5YR asked how many contest and multi-mults used Ten Tec - a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00408.html (14,045 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 20:51:45 -0600; Whoa ... I didn't say "no contest wins with TT equip", let not misquote here ... in fact I'll even provide you with one "win" to start your research ... W4PA at the K4JNY station ... look at his num; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00409.html (9,797 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Orion in contests (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 05:45:00 +0000; <<<2 X 3-500 amps with 3KV and up on the plates are becoming less Hmm, not so sure about that one--besides Ten Tec, Ameritron and QRO both make 2 x 3-500 amps. Unless you are splitting hairs in the s; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00415.html (8,557 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 10:35:08 -1000; Repeated Low Band Monitor <a primary 160/80/40 magazine> indicated a similar trend, tho TenTec was ranked much higher than expected, which is not surprising as to owners who want the very best as to; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00421.html (8,626 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:43:38 -0500; Ken asks, why would Ten Tec be low rated? Because the simple fact is that based on market share, ie sold equipment over the last 15 years or so, and allowing for dead, unused, and shelved rigs, Ten T; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00422.html (10,281 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:20:47 EST; I still want to know why there are so few Orion reviews on eHam. I put a lot more credence in eHam (not individual reviews but the consensus) than a puff piece in QST. Has QST ever reviewed a radio i; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00431.html (8,618 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: "Van Kuykendall" <n5hty@centurytel.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:31:09 -0600 (Central Standard Time); Craig, I guess you have already flamed me as I put a review in eham. I am a proud owner of an Orion. I have never had a problem and am really surprised at all I read on this reflector. Actually makes; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00432.html (9,708 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:43:43 -0500; K4IA wrote: I still want to know why there are so few Orion reviews on eHam. I put a lot more credence in eHam (not individual reviews but the consensus) than a puff piece in QST. Has QST ever review; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00433.html (9,181 bytes)
15. RE: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: "Ron Martin" <royalct@inr.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 05:58:00 -0500; Since I have received my Orion in September there has been four software updates. I would definitely classify those updates as minor-minor, which either made minor changes in is functionality or adde; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00436.html (8,837 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: "john, ke5c" <ke5c@hot.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:09:38 -0600; the best thing about eham reviews is that they are free, so truly worth what you paid for them. or you could do as my friend did, buy a high end ic756pro for over $3k. then a few months later they f; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00439.html (8,953 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:48:05 -0600; Yaesu, (now Vertex Standard) is a regular supporter of NCADXF, and of DX peditions, using their rigs. You have to have a pretty good advertising budget to repeatedly do this. The Yaecomwoods have com; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00445.html (8,843 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Orion in contests (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:26:32 +0000; We have a potential TT customer who posed a reasonable question: why are there few eham reviews of the Orion? He received some responses but no answers. One was something like this: "If you have to a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00450.html (11,047 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Orion in contests (score: 1): Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:57:44 -1000; I suggest that he, and you read the review posted today, 11/17, by John Buck, KH7T. He describes his experiences with his Orion in this weekend's Sweepstakes Contest; and also speaks a bit about the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00452.html (9,557 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Orion in contests (score: 1): Author: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:04:24 -0600; Rob, I and many others like me have been reading the reflector and observing the ORION scene for well over a year now. We have yet to find the type and level of information that you and your friend s; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00453.html (14,841 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]