Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+noise\s+blanker\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+noise\s+blanker\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:58:08 -0500; I have found the hardware noise blanker works great for pulse noise. Have you tried it when your neighbor's work shop is running? Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, North Carolina n4py@earthlink.net --; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00400.html (9,818 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "Bob Cunnings" <cunnings@lectrosonics.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:27:27 -0700; The hardware blanker doesn't seem to do much, it's the software blanker that cuts it down somewhat (S9 to S4 or so). Believe it or not, he's running a 4-axis vertical milling machine in his garage, w; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00401.html (11,124 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker (score: 1): Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:36:11 -0800; The Orion is still on my 'possible' new rig list and I am very curious about its noise blanker functionality. I live in a very troublesome location for electrical and pulse generated noise. There hav; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00407.html (10,329 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "K Van Horn" <k7ec@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:41:12 -0600; The Hardware NB on the Orion is Excellent!! The DSP blanker is effective, but not as good as the Hardware Blankr!! The HW NB on Orion is better than the Omni 6+ NB here. Regards, Kirby, K7EC ________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00408.html (11,433 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:56:47 -0500; Jerry There is only one way to find out. Steve Ellington N4LQ@iglou.com -- Original Message -- From: "Jerry Volpe" <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00409.html (10,972 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:01:27 -0600; Really depends on the kink of noise, for engine/power line type repetitive noise, i agree,hardware is best i've seen. For band noise, the software is good, but for weak signal work, I leave them both; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00410.html (9,261 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:01:22 -0500; I agree, the Orion hardware noise blanker is the best I have seen. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, North Carolina n4py@earthlink.net -- Original Message -- From: "K Van Horn" <k7ec@sbcglobal.net> To:; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00411.html (12,581 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Orion noise blanker (score: 1): Author: jerome schatten <romers@shaw.ca>; Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:38:57 -0800; Carl: Does the Orion's NB unblank the noise in the presence of a signal outside but near the passband of the rx (every NB I've had does this)? i.e. When listening to a CW signal, say, under pulse noi; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00413.html (13,827 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]