Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+vs\s+SDR\-1000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+vs\s+SDR\-1000\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:19:24 -0000; What did you have to buy? I also have an orginal SDR-1000 and plan to play with _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00002.html (8,690 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:17:48 -0000; the I think it really appeals to Bill Bashers and those who have to do it their way. that is they happy even _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00003.html (10,786 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Harry Reed <doon@infoscientific.com>; Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:44:51 -0700; Hi all, While I agree that TT probably should not release source code for the Orion firmware to the F/OSS community, how about releasing a hardware spec that the F/OSS community could code to? Grante; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00005.html (12,213 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:55:22 -0400; Interesting idea. I imagine the existing code is built with licensed 3rd party libraries that could not be released in source. There's a big Xylinx chip in there. I suspect the only well-formatted do; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00007.html (9,272 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 20:05:59 -0000; Some people should design their own hardware and then write the code for their mschines. Might cut down on traffic in the list. Orion firmware to community could *may* be possible to release the the; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00008.html (10,399 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Steve Ireland <vk6vz@arach.net.au>; Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:05:33 +0800; G'day If any Orion users (or anyone else) on the reflector have been following the above thread and would like to try out the SDR-1000 software on air, using their PC, there is a dead cheap way of do; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00040.html (8,440 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: "J. Reed" <jhreed@chilitech.net>; Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 04:10:07 -0400; Steve, I cannot seem to use the site you sent me too... how do I get the software defined receiver for $23 ? Jim Reed, W3RYJ G'day If any Orion users (or anyone else) on the reflector have been follo; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00041.html (9,175 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Steve Ireland <vk6vz@arach.net.au>; Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:55:14 +0800; G'day again Sorry but, to use the Australian vernacular, I 'stuffed up' on the email address for the American QRP Club - it is www.amqrp.org The exact URL for the SoftRock-40 receiver is: http://www.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00042.html (8,962 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 08:26:44 -0400; ** When I look at the keying waveform in the review article the first dit shows up on the antenna AFTER the second dit is produced at the key. No VOX, No QSK, gonna be fixed real soon tho, yep real s; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00817.html (9,044 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:05:37 -0700 (PDT); What problems does the Orion have with QSK and time jitter? Thanks, John NA9U _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00819.html (7,441 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <crgreene@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:36:57 -0400; Bill and All, You are misinformed on a bunch of stuff concerning the SDR-1K. On CW, if you use an external keyer, so what if the code stream lags the key? It's all there and you are not listening to; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00822.html (11,301 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:20:04 -0700 (PDT); Absolutely. Hopefully the Pegasus II will be similar to the SDR-1000 :). No doubt that it's the first of a truly new breed. Since it is so new it is roughly comparable to what the Triton I, SS200, SB; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00825.html (8,979 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 32
Page: [1] [2]