Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+PC\s+for\s+Pegasus\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+PC\s+for\s+Pegasus\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] PC for Pegasus (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington N4LQ); Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 19:06:23 -0500; I have a spare 486 Laptop running win95. Has anyone tried a 486 on a Pegasus? What are the symptoms of a slow PC when using it with the Peagasus? Steve N4LQ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/t; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00222.html (7,002 bytes)
2. [TenTec] PC for Pegasus (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (John - G3JAG); Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 01:37:15 -0000 (GMT); I have an old DX2-66 486 with 64 meg of RAM; it runs Windows 98 very nicely, thank you. It has 4 16550 serial ports and a PS2 mouse; it does not seem to be significantly slower than the P-100 with 32; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00225.html (8,904 bytes)
3. [TenTec] PC for Pegasus (score: 1): Author: at060@chebucto.ns.ca (David McClafferty); Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 22:32:52 -0400 (AST); I was using a 486/66 with windows 3.1. The display lags behind the tuning especially when tuning withthe 302 optional tuning knob. Ocasionally the 302 would quit altogether taking the S meter with it; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00228.html (8,309 bytes)
4. [TenTec] PC for Pegasus (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (John - G3JAG); Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 23:26:28 -0000 (GMT); Yes, I use only 16550's now. They work fine up to 115kbd, which ought to be fast enough for a Pegasus, or even a K2. Thats still a heap slower than the DX2-66 CPU, so its down to the memory overhead; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00248.html (11,750 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]