- 1. [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585 (score: 1)
- Author: Tim & Darlene Isom <nannypoo@mnmars.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:28:07 -0500
- Anyone out there using the Audio in, Audio out, and PTT on the paragon's rear panel hooked to a PK232? If so, having any issues during normal SSB operation with the audio in plug remaining plugged in
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00209.html (9,154 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585 (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:47:11 -0500
- I did that some years ago. One has to be extremely careful so as to avoid any ground loops or any noise on the Audio In line from the PK-232. Seems that I did construct a 20 dB attenuator to operate
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00210.html (10,281 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585 (score: 1)
- Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:57:24 -0500
- As I recall, it was easy to get RF in the SSB audio if a device like the PK232 was left plugged in. You may be able to avoid the problem with audio isolation transformers (or RIGblaster nomic) and cl
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00211.html (9,365 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585 (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 21:55:35 -0500
- One of the issues I've had for years with not only certain earlier models from Tentec but with other companies as well. This is the use of the microphone input for other than microphone usage. In man
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00218.html (12,827 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585 (score: 1)
- Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:47:22 -0400
- Even with my more limited experience, I prefer to run my microphone through an external pre-amp, to boost it up to line level, and then use the Line Level Input - even for the microphone - for the re
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00219.html (10,627 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585 (score: 1)
- Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 06:36:30 -0400
- This is timely. When I first got my Paragon I connected the Kantronics KAM interface I was using to the Audio In/Out jacks and got RF in the audio chain. This was easily remedied by just switching to
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00222.html (11,650 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585 (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 06:47:52 -0500
- Depending on what modes you intend to operate and what software you are using, I have had great success simply using good quality shielded cables between the computer soundcard and the radio. For mod
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00223.html (15,226 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585 (score: 1)
- Author: Mark N8COO <n8coo.ham@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 14:47:41 -0400
- Thought I'd mention that if you are using the Ten-Tec 706/705 microphone, setting the PTT/VOX switch on the bottom to "PTT" will inhibit mic audio unless the PTT button is pressed. Some, maybe all, o
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00238.html (7,626 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585 (score: 1)
- Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:24:04 -0400
- Just a follow-up on this subject, Bob. I wired the new SignaLink USB to the audio in/out jacks of my Paragon, tested it for receiving and transmitting PSK, and listened via the rig monitor to my audi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00356.html (17,456 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] PK232 and Paragon 585 (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 19:02:23 -0500
- In many instances a piece of equipment and associated cables that is powered ON is quite different than the same piece of equipment that is OFF. In the OFF mode it likely appears solely as a random w
- /archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00357.html (21,001 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu