Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+II\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+II\s+Question\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Paragon II question (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:13:27 -0800 (PST); I can find very little on-line about the Ten Tec Paragon II. Is it just an updated Paragon, and if so, what were the main differences? Or is it a vastly improved rig? Does it have an internal keyer,; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00339.html (7,493 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Paragon II question (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:13:35 -0800 (PST); I can find very little on-line about the Ten Tec Paragon II. Is it just an updated Paragon, and if so, what were the main differences? Or is it a vastly improved rig? Does it have an internal keyer,; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00340.html (7,494 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II question (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:52:48 -0500; The Paragon II hardware is only slightly improved over the Paragon. Neither radio has an internal tuner or keyer. The main difference between the Paragon and Paragon II is the Paragon II had more str; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00343.html (8,406 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II question (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:36:20 -0800 (PST); Hi Carl, Thanks for the information. What is the Paragon II like overall as a rig? Pretty good receiver? Does it still have the higher phase noise that the ARRL commented upon for the Paragon? And re; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00347.html (9,961 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II Question (score: 1): Author: "Edward A. Feustel" <efeustel@hughes.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:50:13 -0500; John, The Paragon II has FM built-in. If you are considering Computer Control, the II or the Giehl Chip Set are required. If you look in the TenTec Contesting archives, you will see a few more differ; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00353.html (7,548 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II question (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:46:47 -0500; The Paragon II was basically an updated version that included many of the optional features of the original as standard, such as the RS-232 computer interface. Additionally, and more to the point, it; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00354.html (9,865 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II question (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:03:47 -0500; The Paragon II also transmits on AM. The Paragon I has a nice AM receiver but doesn't transmit in that mode. On the I the serial port and FM module were options, they came built in on the II, and a m; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00355.html (10,115 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II question (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:54:48 -1000; It is worth mentioning that the Paragon II when transmitting in "AM" actually transmits SSB with reinserted carrier. You can select which sideband you want to transmit on. You cannot transmit on both; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00356.html (8,022 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II question (score: 1): Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:07:13 -0500; Ken, Good to know. Certainly not "hi-fi" AM, but in good company. I believe that the Collins KWS-1 did "AM" the same way. 73, Joel, W1ZR _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00360.html (9,425 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II question (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:20:21 -0600; Yes, it did. And some AM mods for S-lines did that too. -- 73, Jerry, K0CQ, Technical Advisor to the CRA All content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer _____________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00361.html (8,389 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II question (score: 1): Author: W1dxh@aol.com; Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:14:59 EST; hello, the paragon 2 is a fine rig, I have had one for a good 10 years. I purchased mine from tentec used.i have all the filters, I use the heil gold line mic with the w2ihy equalizer and get good au; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00443.html (8,583 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Paragon II Question (score: 1): Author: Ed Purvis <wa4njy@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:56:30 -0700 (PDT); I have a chance to buy a nice Paragon II. How does the noise blanker compare to the OMNI V and later rigs? I had an OMNI VI+ and thought the NB was great on my noise.; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-10/msg00205.html (6,986 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II Question (score: 1): Author: w5ot@aol.com; Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:59:30 -0400; The noise blanker in the Omni VI filtered out a recent line noise from a bad lightning arrestor, while the Paragon 2 did not. 73, John I have a chance to buy a nice Paragon II. How does the noise bla; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-10/msg00240.html (7,765 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II Question (score: 1): Author: Ed Purvis <wa4njy@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:09:30 -0700 (PDT); Thanks John, That is the real-world info I need. Hopefully, I can learn the subtle differences before buying and avoid disappointment later. Can I assume you are talking about an OMNI VI a; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-10/msg00244.html (9,033 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]