Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+Question\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 22:24:48 -0500; Carl's comments are very correct. One other difference is in the 100 KHz to 1.7 MHz range. The front end switching and attenuation does reduce the sensitivity on the Paragon II. Also the Paragon II m; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00146.html (11,439 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 07:44:52 -0400; Carl's comments about the band stacking registers is true, but substituting a readily available Giehl chip provides 585 with the same user interface and band stacking registers as the 586. Of more im; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00158.html (9,543 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 08:23:10 -0400; I contracted with TenTec in 1994 and did the firmware for the Paragon II. The Paragon II design point was to make the user interface as close to the Omni VI as possible. The Paragon II uses the same; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00159.html (11,172 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:14:38 -0400; Right, Carl. Based on off-list comments I may not have been as clear as I could have been before. The use of a Giehl chip changes the front panel user interface on the Paragon to be essentially the s; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00180.html (9,872 bytes)
25. [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Chuck <ka6uup@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:39:51 -0700; Is there an adjustment I can make to center my cw receive audio in the center of the cw filter passband. I have to run my RIT -.3 kHz in order to center the other station during a cw qso. Not a big d; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00169.html (6,561 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:20:18 +0000; Assuming you already know that you must tune the other station in so that its tone matches your sidetone reference (usually between 600-750hz, check your manual), you may need to align your BFO oscil; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00170.html (7,776 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:51:35 -1000; The narrow filters in the Paragon are all in the 6.3 MHz IF, which can be shifted in frequency space using the PBT control. You should be able to zero beat (that is get the audio note frequency of th; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00172.html (9,322 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Chuck <ka6uup@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:45:07 -0700; Here is what I have done. First, I noticed a problem when monitoring W1AW. When tuned to 14.0475 ( or 7.0475) I noticed that to maximize the receive audio, I had to tune .3 kHz off freq, using the RI; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00181.html (8,065 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 01:02:59 -1000; Hi Chuck, Turn the RIT and XIT off or set them to zero. Should be that same thing. Start by tuning a strong CW signal with the Paragon in CW mode with the 6.0 kHz BW filter selected. You should be ab; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00182.html (11,465 bytes)
30. [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Rod Greene via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:13:19 +0000 (UTC); My (new to me) Paragon is working pretty well, but I have a couple of questions: The PBT control seems to work best at 12 oclock for SSB and 11 oclock for CW. Is this normal or do I need tomake some; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00003.html (7,187 bytes)
31. [TenTec] paragon question (score: 1): Author: mark kenward via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 21:58:25 -0400; I dont have a paragon, but a Paragon II, Omni A and Omni C which have PTO like Paragon does. Paragon II is a phase lock loop rig and is quite different. You need to check the PTO frequencies and set; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00005.html (8,193 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] paragon question (score: 1): Author: Lee <lee@wa3fiy.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:32:28 +0000; Actually, the Paragon and the Paragon II both have phased lock loop oscillators. 73, -Lee WA3FIY -- Original Message -- From: "mark kenward via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com> To: "w7zrc@yahoo.com" <; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00006.html (10,005 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] paragon question (score: 1): Author: Rod Greene via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:38:27 +0000 (UTC); Mark, Thanks for your suggestions. I do have the alignment procedure but don't have the test equipment to perform the steps shown in the procedure. I think my Paragon is pretty close so I may just us; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00007.html (9,121 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] paragon question (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <kenradiobrown@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:54:06 -1000; Yes, controlled by a microprocessor and a digital rotary encoder on the main VFO knob. There is no PTO and no mechanical moving parts directly controlling an oscillator. Frequency readout error in Pa; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00008.html (11,139 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] paragon question (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:01:11 -0400; Yup! PLL in both paragon and paragon II Mike wb8vge Sent from my iPad Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad. ____________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00009.html (7,479 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] paragon question (score: 1): Author: Rod Greene via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:38:00 +0000 (UTC); Thanks Ken, I am going to try to check that out myself. I think I can find a freq counter. 73, Rod/w7zrc Frequency readout error in Paragons can be due to master reference oscillator being off freque; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00010.html (11,827 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 22:03:42 -0400; Rod: Based on your description, it's more likely the various BFO frequencies need to be aligned more that the reference oscillator. Start with the LSB, USB and CW BFO frequencies first. 73, Bob WB2VU; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-10/msg00018.html (9,219 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 37
Page: [1] [2]