Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Paragon\s+question\s*$/: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: RKolarik@csi.com (Ron Kolarik); Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 21:42:28 -0600; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_000A_01BE44BD.C68EAF20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I popped the 25A fuse i; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00409.html (8,304 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: peterville@sprintmail.com (simon jaworski); Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 21:53:52 -0500; I have been a Paragon owner now for many years. Its a great rig! The rig I used prior to the Paragon was a Delta transceiver with the outboard VFO. I liked the feature on the Delta that allowed me to; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-12/msg00338.html (7,026 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: IMCEAMS-SIAMAIL_JOCY2_INGRER@sea.siemens.com (Ingraham, Ed @JOCY); Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 08:23:34 -0400; I'm thinking about looking for a Paragon and I wonder what I should look for in one. I don't want to buy a Paragon and then discover that a later version had some feature that I can't add to it. For; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-04/msg00100.html (7,049 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: "ultrafixedwing@juno.com" <ultrafixedwing@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 00:59:43 GMT; If I tune up from 6.000 mHz, when I hit 6.500 there is a click and the signal strength drops way, way off. I can hear signals very faint. I continue up to 10.500 and it clicks and signal strength kic; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00026.html (7,471 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: "NZ8J" <nz8j@woh.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:12:17 -0500; Paul, It sounds to me like a relay on the bandpass filter board. I don't have a schematic in front of me, but I bet if you look at the bandpass filter board you'll find that the frequencies you menti; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00028.html (8,055 bytes)
6. RE: [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:45:59 -0800; Paul-This problem is almost certainly related to the filter relays on the LPF board. Early Paragons used reed relays to select the LPFs, but this was a pretty expensive approach. As a result, in late; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00030.html (8,967 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: "ultrafixedwing@juno.com" <ultrafixedwing@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 02:47:39 GMT; I replaced D12 on the HPF board with a 1N4148 diode from Radio Shack. The original is a glass silicon diode. Buck and a half for 10 of them. Seems to work OK now. I'll keep my fingers crossed. Paul K; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00056.html (7,398 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:31:43 -0000; Great! I'm confused tho. Thought you had an intermittent condition and were talking abt relay replacement - maybe some one else around the same time. Really like your parts cost! original is a glass; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00057.html (8,393 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: David McClafferty <ve1adh@yahoo.ca>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:39:31 -0500 (EST); The original was probably a PIN diode. That's what is in the Pegasus. I was told by Tentec that I could use a 1N914/1N4148 as temporary replacement but that I should eventually get the proper replace; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00063.html (8,736 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:58:37 -0000; KS2S sent me a copy of the high pass filter page for the Paragon. D12 is clearly shown as a 1N4148. D1 thru D8 are BA482. Not exactly a pin diode but close enough. Which PIN diode did the PEG use ? _; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00065.html (10,202 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: David McClafferty <ve1adh@yahoo.ca>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:43:32 -0500 (EST); The Peg uses RLS135's. Dave, VE1ADH -- Steve Baron - KB3MM <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com> wrote: ___________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00077.html (11,134 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:16:31 -0000; Apparently discontinued. Don' want to spend the reat of my life searching all UK, EU data shets. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00078.html (12,647 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Paragon question (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@qsl.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 17:28:38 -0500; I find that if I have a relay problem causing low receiver sensitivity, I can fix it by transmitting (into a dummy load) on the ham band for the relay in question. A few pushes of the tune button or; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00156.html (10,874 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:56:53 -0700; Is a Paragon 585 a Paragon I or Paragon II? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00076.html (7,014 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Jim Miller <k4sqr@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:34:56 -0400; Rick, Model 585 = Paragon. Model 586= Paragon II Save this: www.qsl.net/tentec for the oldies. Click on transceivers and every one made will appear! 73, Jim Miller, K4SQR http://www.comteksystems.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00077.html (7,501 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: "Phil Chambley, Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 16:38:24 -0400; 585 is Paragon. 586 is P II. 73 Phil VFO Stabilizers and PEP adapters for wattmeters...Check out http://home.comcast.net/~k4dpk -- Original Message -- From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> To: "'Discussion o; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00078.html (7,618 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: "M. P. Haynes" <k4beh@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 19:58:57 -0400; It is a Paragon, not the Paragon II. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00080.html (7,308 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:38:34 -0500; The 585 is a Paragon. There is no such critter as a Paragon I. The Paragon II is a 586. I have both on my desk. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00083.html (8,108 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 17:56:20 -1000; Hi Bob, I too have both a 585 and a 586 on my desk. I had intended to carefully compare the two, and then decide which one of them to offer for sale. I never seem to find the time to make my careful; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00137.html (8,430 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:12:56 -0400; Ken, The Paragon II has band registers and a much nicer user interface. It is much closer to the Omni VI in operation than the Paragon. It also has a quiter synthesizer. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinto; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00140.html (9,434 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]