Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ParagonII\s+Audio\s+BP\s+Fade\s+Feature\s+Mods\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ParagonII\s+Audio\s+BP\s+Fade\s+Feature\s+Mods\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ParagonII Audio BP Fade Feature Mods (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:40:51 -0500; If you have a Paragon II and feel that the Fade - BP audio is broad and ineffective, check the following value on the IF/AF board. This board is located on the bottom/front RH side. You must remove t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00727.html (7,373 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] ParagonII Audio BP Fade Feature Mods (score: 1): Author: "Scott Prather" <sdprat@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:00:44 -0800; I would like to thank Steve for posting this information concerning incorrect component values in the Paragon II audio filter circuit. Minutes after I received this e-mail last night, I checked the I; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00761.html (9,729 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] ParagonII Audio BP Fade Feature Mods (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:21:05 -0500; Interesting. My schematic showed R64 to be 33k but information from the chip manufacture suggested a 10k should be used, which is in fact used in the second stage. I used my substitution box with lea; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00764.html (11,245 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]