Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Patcomm\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Patcomm\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Patcomm (score: 1): Author: "Caitlyn M. Martin" <mizuhoradio@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:27:13 -0800 (PST); Hi, Stuart and everyone else, Well... maybe between last October (when Frank still claimed Patcomm was a going concern) and now they finally died. Pity. I may have to find a PC-500 on the used market; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00640.html (8,054 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Patcomm (score: 1): Author: wa8vbx@wowway.com; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:05:25 -0600; Yes Patcomm, is no longer. I sent a email to them with some questions about the PC-500 at the end od December, and about 3 weeks later, got a reply saying that they are no longer in business. -- WOW!; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00649.html (9,347 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Patcomm (score: 1): Author: "Jim FitzSimons" <cherry@getnet.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:30:19 -0700; I have a PC-500. Jim FitzSimons W7ANF Yes Patcomm, is no longer. I sent a email to them with some questions about the PC-500 at the end od December, and about 3 weeks later, got a reply saying that t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00663.html (9,122 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]