Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Pegasus\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Pegasus\s*$/: 199 ]

Total 199 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington N4LQ); Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 11:15:14 -0500; Sounds like you need the newer software version. My old ver 1.62 was like that but the newer versions seem to center the bfo correctly. Download ver 1.63 beta from the TT web site. It works great. Ot; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00511.html (8,492 bytes)
42. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: paulc@mediaone.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 13:16:29 -0500; Download the new V1.62 software from the Ten-Tec web site or simply activate your passband tuning control. The Pegasus is capable of excellent single-signal reception with a complete absence of the o; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00521.html (8,385 bytes)
43. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Sun, 26 Dec 1999 13:57:21 -0500; Hi Steve, Thanks for the tip. Been there, got it, 1.63b working fb here. Hearing only one side of the signal now. 73, de Joe - AA4NN -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00525.html (7,184 bytes)
44. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 5 Nov 1999 16:17:03 LOC; Does anybody know if the Pegasus has been reviewed by QST yet? I'm not a member of the ARRL so I don't get QST. And if not, do you know which issue it is scheduled to be reviewed in? Thanks, 73 Scott; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00115.html (7,637 bytes)
45. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 5 Nov 1999 16:35:31 -0500; Scott, Don't know as I am behind in my reading, but QST reviews and support of ham radio B4 FCC are just two of many benefits you would get as a member of ARRL;-- cheap rig insurance too. You could r; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00116.html (7,865 bytes)
46. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 17:49:31 -0500; It should be interesting to look at it's review next to the Kerchunka's review. I sure like the looks of Pegasus better. I don't think Pegasus needs drive slot on the front of the computer either for; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00117.html (8,990 bytes)
47. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: ve1lt@globalserve.net (Mr. "B"); Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 13:07:52 -0400; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0021_01BF2857.EEC4BD80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings from Nova Sco; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00124.html (11,117 bytes)
48. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: bigmack@nortexinfo.net (Robert); Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 07:49:31 -0600; --==_66300046==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed The page listed below seems to be offline.... --==_66300046==_.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" <html>; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00125.html (9,701 bytes)
49. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 09:47:22 -0600; Did you simply delete the "/review/" portion of the URL, then click on 41 reviews...., then HF Transceivers, then Ten-Tec Pegasus ?? That works. 73, dale, kg5u section for There -- FAQ on WWW: http:/; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00128.html (8,632 bytes)
50. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: ve1lt@globalserve.net (Doug/VE1LT); Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 20:50:38 -0400; Hello Everybody: Well got my new Pegasus up and going strong. Very satisfied so far. Receiver is good plus. Very nice audio on receive. Getting good audio reports on the transmit end. Lets just say t; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00343.html (8,515 bytes)
51. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: w6hv@earthlink.net (Troy Wideman); Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 19:29:44 -0800; I just read the "first look at the Pegasus" on the ARRL members only web site. Any Pegasus owners read it yet? Agree with the author? 73, Troy -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm S; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00345.html (8,265 bytes)
52. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 04:09:46 -0000; Sounds reasonable. Like he says, it isn't an OMNI - but a lot of bang for the buck. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests:; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00348.html (9,348 bytes)
53. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: Tim Cook" <timcook@erinet.com (Tim Cook); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 09:26:08 -0500; I haven't received my Pegasus yet, but have looked at the GUI to some degree and a couple of the observations in the "First Look" don't agree with what I have experienced. 1. He states: "One thing th; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00351.html (10,657 bytes)
54. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: at060@chebucto.ns.ca (David McClafferty); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:44:37 -0400 (AST); Your right, you can type in a new frequency any time, highlighted or not. There is a menu to program the "F" keys and I think it is under "settings", "remote pod". 73. Dave, VE1ADH -- FAQ on WWW: htt; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00353.html (12,107 bytes)
55. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: jcox@digitalexp.com (Jim Cox); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 09:40:22 -0600; Yes, you can type in the frequency any time from the keyboard or the remote pad. The function keys on the pad can be programmed to assign the knob to runing of the vfo, pbt, rit, or xit. It can be tu; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00355.html (8,826 bytes)
56. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:32:13 -0500 (EST); Wonder if one could make a bigger pod and end up with the entire radio on it? Then you would have an IC-706 type radio only better. Steve Ellington N4LQ N4LQ@IGLOU.COM -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.conte; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00358.html (9,934 bytes)
57. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: k7kj@teleport.com (Greg Hodsdon); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 11:58:22 -0800; The ARRL article is interesting; my comments follow: 1. With regard to receiver performance, the numbers will be out when the full review is done by the ARRL and then comparisons can be made. However; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00363.html (11,160 bytes)
58. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: k6xr@earthlink.net (Reginald Mackey sr.); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:27:20 -0800; I concur with Greg in all points. I think the reviewer missed something --perhaps some bias???? Reggie, (k6xr) Southwest Bakersfield, Ca. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submis; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00365.html (12,627 bytes)
59. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: dacalvin@us.ibm.com (dacalvin@us.ibm.com); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:21:48 -0600; I guess I'm missing something too - what in the world did the reviewer miss? What is his "bias"? He tried it out for an evening and made what I thought was a very positive report. The end of his arti; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00366.html (14,268 bytes)
60. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: k7kj@teleport.com (Greg Hodsdon); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 14:00:05 -0800; Duane: I agree, I think N1RL wrote an informative and positive article on the Pegasus.? His comments were consistent with my observations in most respects. And no, I certainly am not saying or expect; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00367.html (9,558 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]