Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Pegasus\s+Software\/PcPakRatt\s+Version\s+1\.0\/NT\s+4\.0\s+Performance\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: heimbachk@mindspring.com (Karl Heimbach)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 07:26:59 -0500
Gang, Is anyone else running the above combination? I've observed some rather bizarre occurrences with the Pegasus software since installing PcPakRatt. I 've been running the Pegasus software on an A
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00125.html (10,061 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 13:52:39 +0100
Karl, Are both/each program(s) 16 bit ? 32 bit ? PC PcPakRatt -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contest
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00128.html (11,555 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 15:16:07 +0100
Karl, Downloaded the Pegasus software this morning since I had not received a response to my question as to whether it is 16 or 32 bit software. The install is definitely 16 bit so one has to assume
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00130.html (12,661 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.)
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 09:58:52 -0500
Practically every maker of windoze software figures he knows your computer and uses better than you and can therefore change everything including DLLs necessary for your living as he wishes. The safe
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00131.html (10,275 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 16:22:29 +0100
Don't worry about the BIOS for many things - it isn't used except during BOOT time and in some special compatibility cases. It the software uses standard software to access the devices, you could dro
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00133.html (11,762 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 16:48:46 +0100
That is certainly one way to go that but is not risk free especially with Norton stuff. Versions and file dependencies are very complicated and may be totally ignored by some programs. Problems creat
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00134.html (11,224 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.)
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 11:12:01 -0500
I've written one program to extract windoze fonts for my own use, both in C and C++. The C++ program with the same windoze interfaces and function was 30% larger than the C program. Same compiler. I
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00135.html (9,755 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: kc0dxf@yahoo.com (Robert Wooldridge)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 10:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
Why not choose a free operating system? The Debian project is a not for profit Linux based Distribution. The Debian Social contract is a guarantee of commitment to users that all software will confor
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00136.html (12,778 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 20:57:47 +0100
I think every one would agree that C++ programs are generally bigger than C programs. May not be sure what you are saying about the ports. The origianl question was about an NT system. We know that N
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00138.html (11,223 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 21:12:34 +0100
I believe that you get what you pay for. The last time I looked there were over 200 flavors of Unix with many significant differences. There are now several flavors of Linux....any differences ? The
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00139.html (15,161 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: kc0dxf@yahoo.com (Robert Wooldridge)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 20:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
All, Sorry to continue this computer thread but I think it is important for HAMs to understand that there is a choice in Operating Systems and the Linux choice is becoming more and more viable. I bel
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00141.html (13,571 bytes)

12. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: elilustig@bigfoot.com (Eli Lustig)
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 07:24:09 -0400
Really tired of this thread. This is the Ten Tec reflector, please take your soapbox to a Unix reflector where subscribers may care. Eli Lustig, KF4YOG Triton IV, Omni D, RX-320 All, Sorry to continu
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00143.html (14,398 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Pegasus Software/PcPakRatt Version 1.0/NT 4.0 Performance (score: 1)
Author: bcitkow@execpc.com (Bob)
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 07:39:52 -0500
i second the motion. it got off track really quick from the original post! bob/n9jak --Original Message-- From: Eli Lustig <elilustig@bigfoot.com> To: 'Robert Wooldridge' <kc0dxf@yahoo.com>; tentec@c
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00144.html (9,301 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu