- 1. [TenTec] Pegasus or Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: Robert.W.Hosken@aero.org (Robert W Hosken)
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:20:35 -0700
- The idea of using the Jupiter with the N4PY software looks great. Since I plan on using the rig at the QTH with a computer, is there any reason to buy the Jupiter instead of the Pegasus, except for $
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00183.html (6,992 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Pegasus or Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: jhurry@austin.rr.com (Dudley Hurry)
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:43:40 -0500
- Bob, The main thing that I can think of is resale value. Many hams still do not own a computer, or never will hook one to a radio. There are times that I just don't want to turn on the computer just
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00184.html (8,432 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Pegasus or Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh)
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 21:28:15 -0400
- Bob, In all the important details, the Jupiter and the Pegasus are the same receiver and transmitter. I did discover that when you do a frequency scan on the Jupiter in front panel mode, the firmware
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00186.html (8,416 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] Pegasus or Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: crobson@robsonco.com (Chris Robson)
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:22:17 -0400
- I have a Jup and N4PY software also, along with Writelog for Windows. I can now contest with my Jup and have radio control on Writelog since contesting with a knob in front of you is sometimes prefer
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00190.html (7,911 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] Pegasus or Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: Jim FitzSimons" <cherry@getnet.net (Jim FitzSimons)
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 07:33:31 -0700
- The Jupiter has the same pre-amp as the RX-350. So there are a few differences between the Pegasus and the Jupiter. I am happy with my Pegasus. If the Jupiter was available in 1999 I would have a Jup
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00193.html (8,319 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu