Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Precision\s+in\s+Frequency\s+displays\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
Date: Tue Mar 4 18:59:04 2003
Let's get real: 1,000,000 Hz (a MHz). 1 per cent is 0.01 of that, or 10kHz 0.1 per cent is 0.001 of that or 1,000 Hz 0.01 per cent is 0.0001 of 1 MHz or 100 Hz And 0.001 per cent is the debated 10 Hz
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00127.html (8,272 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi)
Date: Tue Mar 4 19:57:49 2003
Stuart, It's not the acuracy here by displaying to a 1 hertz value that's real important. It's the ability to adjust the frequency in 1 hertz increments. I have a mode I call SAM for sync AM that is
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00133.html (9,823 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: efricha@dimensional.com (Eric F. Richards)
Date: Tue Mar 4 21:35:37 2003
I'd like to throw my opinion in on this as well, but first a little background on me: I am a ham, but the time I spend in HF is spent listening. I primarily listen to utility/military stations, but I
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00137.html (12,506 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: ken.d.brown@verizon.net (Ken Brown)
Date: Tue Mar 4 23:35:56 2003
Hi all, My fourty something year old ears (which are better than my memory of how old I am) can definitely tell the difference between a 10 Hz beat and a 1 Hz beat. Does it matter? Probably not for C
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00142.html (8,494 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: efricha@dimensional.com (Eric F. Richards)
Date: Wed Mar 5 00:31:41 2003
Anyone who took high-school physics should be able to give a learned discourse on the subject, especially if he or she ever had an answer overwritten with "SIG FIGS" in red ink! :-) -- Eric F. Richar
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00143.html (9,428 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: DennisKT5D@aol.com (DennisKT5D@aol.com)
Date: Wed Mar 5 08:32:31 2003
If the errorenous idea exists that frequency accuracy is perceived as the solution to selective fading problems while receiving AM in SSB mode, then one must realize that no amount of dial frequency
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00148.html (8,274 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: efricha@dimensional.com (Eric F. Richards)
Date: Wed Mar 5 09:39:18 2003
No, but ECSS, as using SSB to receive AM signals is called, is sometimes your only option when you don't have a true synchronous AM -- one that phase-locks with the carrier -- available. Also, many
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00150.html (9,142 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: ken.d.brown@verizon.net (Ken Brown)
Date: Wed Mar 5 12:26:48 2003
Dennis, When selective fading causes the carrier to drop far below the amplitude of the sidebands, reinserting a carrier with a BFO is a way to improve detection of the AM signal. This is not erroneo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00158.html (8,591 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX)
Date: Wed Mar 5 13:04:24 2003
turn the knob until I hear what I want to hear. On the other hand, some folks set the frequency with the KNOB and then complain that other stations don't sound correct. Isn't this like putting the c
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00160.html (10,252 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
Date: Wed Mar 5 14:36:47 2003
OH, Ok Carl, I missed the comments about the other mode of operation you were interested in. Interesting mode. I wonder as someone did if any capability for closer control of the BFO is possible in u
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00165.html (8,325 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: Gaardens@surferie.net (Rich Gaarden)
Date: Wed Mar 5 17:17:52 2003
Well, perhaps the theory doesn't support careful zero beating and ssb as a help for selective fading but, my experience with a Jupiter and N4PY software does. Aerodynamic theory, at one point, said b
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00181.html (9,079 bytes)

12. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman)
Date: Wed Mar 5 18:47:23 2003
I hate it when the damn Bees do that ! Gary P Hoffman - Aerospace Engineer. ((grin)) 73 to all, de AA2IZ perceived mode, help
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00195.html (9,919 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1)
Author: DennisKT5D@aol.com (DennisKT5D@aol.com)
Date: Wed Mar 5 19:33:04 2003
Sherwood Engineering does a nice job too.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00202.html (7,624 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu