- 1. [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Jones via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 16:28:15 +0000 (UTC)
- QEX magazine May/June 2008 M0MWA presents a computer controlled turnable bandpass filter (preselector)for use with software defined radios.1.8-30 mhz article includes schematics. Good luck, Rich K8
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00262.html (7,497 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
- Author: Gary J FollettDukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:50:15 -0500
- One might think this device would help analog radios as well. Most lack the preselector feature and have half octave filters, which may be inadequate in some situations. Gary ________________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00265.html (7,928 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:17:04 -0700
- There is an important difference between a pre-selector and a bandpass filter, at least for the application that Rick has raised -- it's bandwidth. The issue that he has raised, and it can be a VERY
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00269.html (9,185 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 17:50:55 -0400
- Jim, Good points, although as I look at the HEROS passpand plot -- and although it may first appear wide on the graph, it looks reasonably close to the preselector response we see from Collins 75S or
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00270.html (10,499 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
- Author: Spencer <w1gak@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:54:12 -0600
- A well constructed magnetic loop works very well. Not easy to do. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00271.html (7,461 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
- Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:31:55 +0200
- Paul, I can't comment on the effectiveness of 10dB attenuation with these modern SDR receivers/transceivers because I haven't used any of them. I currently have one tiny QRP SDR transceiver and it do
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00273.html (13,161 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
- Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:34:57 +0200
- And not very contest-effective! 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt, Germany) A well constructed magnetic loop works very well. Not easy to do. _______________________________________________ TenTec mail
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00274.html (8,427 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 09:26:08 -0700
- It would work quite well as a receive antenna. And yes, magnetic loops are well known to have quite narrow bandwidth, which would allow nulling interference along one axis. N6RK uses a magnetic RX lo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00280.html (8,922 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
- Author: Spencer <w1gak@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:09:41 -0600
- Jim Brown wrote: t would work quite well as a receive antenna. And yes, magnetic loops are well known to have quite narrow bandwidth, which would allow nulling interference along one axis. N6RK uses
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00283.html (8,818 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] Preselector for SDR (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:50:55 -0700
- Seems like all those hams with their RVs need an education about RFI from their own stuff! NO ham should be using any switch-mode power supplies that are external to equipment. It's relatively easy t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00285.html (9,135 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu