Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Problem\s+on\s+160\s+meters\,\s+Whats\s+up\?\s+Thanks\s+\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Problem\s+on\s+160\s+meters\,\s+Whats\s+up\?\s+Thanks\s+\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? Thanks ! (score: 1): Author: Jeff <n3jbh@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:20:10 -0700 (PDT); Hey might most gracious and sincere thanks too every one that responded. Paul from Palstar insisted that it was not his balun but seems every one else and i do mean EVERY ONE ELSE And that was over; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00338.html (7,611 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? Thanks ! (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <Mike_N4NT@embarqmail.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:41:36 -0400; Hi Jeff, If you are feeding this antenna with ladder line, do you need a balun at all? 73, Mike N4NT Hey might most gracious and sincere thanks too every one that responded. Paul from Palstar insiste; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00339.html (7,574 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? Thanks ! (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:01:16 -0500; OK I'll accept the fact that the Palstar tuner uses a 1:1 balun on the input. Now that raises the question, and I guess I could have researched it, but then is the Palstar tuner a balanced tuner? As; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00342.html (8,702 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Problem on 160 meters, Whats up? Thanks ! (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:35:18 -0500; Just because a tuner has a balun on its input, its own circuit can still be unbalanced (like an L net). That might still work on many balanced antennas if you lift the ground side of the L net with t; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00357.html (11,554 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]