Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Product\s+Reviews\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Product\s+Reviews\s+II\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Product Reviews II (score: 1): Author: w3uls@3n.net (John Rippey); Date: Sat Jul 5 10:08:52 2003; As has been pointed out in previous postings, there is precious little information available (outside of the manufacturer) to guide a ham's transceiver purchase. ARRL is one source, and people with g; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00166.html (9,220 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Product Reviews II (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sun Jul 6 00:07:31 2003; John, the keyed waveform spectra for both the 746PRO and the PRO2 show that the keying components are more than 50 dB down at +/- 300 Hz from the carrier frequency. Not bad . . . General agreement wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00184.html (7,364 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]