- 1. [TenTec] Q: Delta I vs. Delta II (score: 1)
- Author: "jay pea" <ne4tt@mail2Cool.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:14:39 -0700
- What are the differences between the Delta I, model 280, and Delta II, model 536? The only difference I have noted from the "Unofficial TT Pages", is the Delta I uses filter boards, and the Delta II
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00842.html (7,183 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Q: Delta I vs. Delta II (score: 1)
- Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:31:42 -0000
- There are huge differences between the Delta and Delta II. Probably the biggest difference is the Delta II has general coverage receive. Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, NC -- Original Message -- From
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00845.html (8,585 bytes)
- 3. RE: [TenTec] Q: Delta I vs. Delta II (score: 1)
- Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:37:01 -0700
- The Delta I resembles the Argosy and the Delta II the Argonaut II. The Delta I was a pure analog transceiver with a PTO VFO. The Delta II had a synthesized VFO, and thus dual VFOs. Of course, as Carl
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00860.html (8,605 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Q: Delta I vs. Delta II (score: 1)
- Author: "M. P. Haynes" <k4beh@juno.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:46:25 -0400
- Hi Jamie, I never owned the original Delta 580 but do own the Delta II. The Delta 580 had a permeability tuned oscillator much like the older OMNI's, Tritons Corsairs, etc. They were noted for their
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00863.html (10,142 bytes)
- 5. RE: [TenTec] Q: Delta I vs. Delta II (score: 1)
- Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:12:10 -0700
- The 580 also has the WARC bands. It only worked CW and SSB. In addition to the crystal SSB and CW filters, it also had a 4-pole audio filter with positions for SSB and CW. I have a Spec sheet on the
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00885.html (11,384 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu