Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+QRP\s+transceivers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+QRP\s+transceivers\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 03:40:48 -0500; Has anyone else noticed the rather close resemblance between the TT R4020 CW QRP transceiver and the MFJ-92xx QRP CW transceiver ? Do ya suppose they share some genetic lineage? -- K8JHR -- - _______; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00227.html (6,630 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:27:12 +0100; I thought TT had an exclusive on that. Apparently not. BTW, I'm still waiting for someone to bring out a QRP Antenna. You know what I mean, the kind that fits inside the living room and is just 6dB d; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00228.html (7,662 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:28:27 -0500; ER... um.... what tower? Say... Maybe we could design a No-tune, all-band Fractal Isotron Hybrid end-loaded, tuned, screwdriver antenna with capacity hat, capacity shoes, trapped coil quad loop, and; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00229.html (7,565 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:00:46 +0200; That's the problem dealing with the Chinese. They take their contracts literally. So if you contract with a factory in China to make a particular radio, they see nothing wrong with contracting with s; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00230.html (8,679 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:19:48 -0600 (CST); IIRC, the MFJ flavor has more bands on it than the two Ten-Tec ones. So technically, since they are different radios and slightly different designs... Hey, it works for the big box stores. Ever notic; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00231.html (8,886 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:48:37 -0500; Oh... this intrigues me... it would be great fun to know the new Elecraft rig is based on what was originally a Chinese kit, and also can say TT and MFJ sell versions of it. I think that would hurt s; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00232.html (7,642 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:13:50 +0100; Sorry to bust your bubble guys, but the new Elecraft is going to cost a lot more and be a lot more. The biggest similarity is the looks. Who knows, this may be the new look of all rigs to come! (hope; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00233.html (8,605 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:20:35 -0500; Now hold on a minute there bunky... I wouldn't go that far, and I'm simply noticing a cosmetic difference. While I have no interest in buying one, I also have no interest in trashing Elecraft, direct; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00234.html (8,994 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:47:16 -0500; Sorry, Ron. Good observation. I was not really intending to heat up the parochial brand wars. Perhaps I overstated my case. All I meant to say was, considering the new Elecraft rig has gotten a lot o; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00236.html (8,607 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:05:41 -0500; I'm sure that the Elecraft KX3 is their own design. I would make three observations: 1. My personal preference would be for an American kit radio over a Chinese assembled radio. For me, building it i; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00237.html (11,464 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:21:11 -0800; Yes, and it is a highly innovative one. I consider it a brilliant design and concept. I've held one in my hand, but haven't played with it. 73, Jim KYC _______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00238.html (8,443 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 18:03:22 +0100; I bought an 817 when they first came out. I was impressed by the design and build quality. I sold it two weeks later. The receiver was crap for European bands. Let me be more specific, it was sensiti; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00239.html (12,796 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: Don Allen <w9cw@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:57:50 -0600; The Elecraft KX3 is totally an Elecraft design, and it's a software-defined radio (SDR) architecture, plus roofing filters. I know Eric reasonably well, and I can assure you the KX3 is not a "copy ca; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00242.html (8,357 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:52:09 -0500; Since I'm the one who brought it up... On closer examination, no, the KX3 is not a clone or derivative of the Chinese rigs. My apologies for that speculation. There are some similarities to the size; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00247.html (9,378 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 14:54:37 -0500; No problem at my end,... and I was "spitballing" when I was kidding around about how that would be really ironic... I surely did not mean to stir up any REAL range war over it. Humor is a dangerous t; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00248.html (9,006 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] QRP transceivers (score: 1): Author: Don Allen <w9cw@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 15:08:15 -0600; No offense taken here at all... I just thought there was some confusion on how the KX3 evolved. It's actually larger than either of the other rigs too. It would be rather humorous if Elecraft importe; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-12/msg00249.html (8,331 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]